Cargando…

The Myth of Coequal Branches : Restoring the Constitution's Separation of Functions /

"The idea that the three branches of U.S. government are equal in power is taught in classrooms, proclaimed by politicians, and referenced in the media. But, as David Siemers shows, that idea is a myth, neither intended by the Founders nor true in practice. Siemers explains how adherence to thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Siemers, David J. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Columbia, Mo. : University of Missouri, [2018]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_62308
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905050419.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 181029t20182018mou o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780826274212 
020 |z 9780826221698 
035 |a (OCoLC)1059451100 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Siemers, David J.,  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The Myth of Coequal Branches :   |b Restoring the Constitution's Separation of Functions /   |c by David J. Siemers. 
264 1 |a Columbia, Mo. :  |b University of Missouri,  |c [2018] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2019 
264 4 |c ©[2018] 
300 |a 1 online resource (244 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Studies in constitutional democracy 
505 0 |a Introduction: the myth of equality -- The public face of contemporary coequality -- The founding generation and interbranch power -- "The relative power of the ... branches has always ebbed and flowed" -- The presidency and interbranch power -- The judiciary: guardians of distinctive functions or guardians of coequal branches? -- The "first branch" becomes coequal -- "We the People" at a crossroads. 
520 |a "The idea that the three branches of U.S. government are equal in power is taught in classrooms, proclaimed by politicians, and referenced in the media. But, as David Siemers shows, that idea is a myth, neither intended by the Founders nor true in practice. Siemers explains how adherence to this myth normalizes a politics of gridlock, in which the action of any branch can be checked by the reaction of any other. The Founders, however, envisioned a separation of functions rather than a separation of powers. Siemers argues that this view needs to replace our current view, so that the goals set out in the Constitution's Preamble may be better achieved"--Publisher's description 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Separation of powers.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01112740 
650 7 |a Constitutional history.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00875777 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Reference.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x National.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Essays.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Histoire constitutionnelle  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Separation des pouvoirs  |z États-Unis. 
650 0 |a Constitutional history  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Separation of powers  |z United States. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/62308/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2019 Complete 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2019 Political Science and Policy Studies