Cargando…
Scalia v. Scalia : Opportunistic Textualism in Constitutional Interpretation /
Scalia v. Scalia:Opportunistic Textualism in Constitutional Interpretation examines Scalia's discussions of textualism in his speeches, extrajudicial writings, and judicial opinions. Throughout his writings, Scalia argues textualism is the only acceptable form of constitutional interpretation....
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Tuscaloosa :
The University of Alabama Press,
[2017]
|
| Colección: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000004a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | musev2_57336 | ||
| 003 | MdBmJHUP | ||
| 005 | 20230905045901.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr||||||||nn|n | ||
| 008 | 180103s2017 alu o 00 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780817391607 | ||
| 020 | |z 9780817319700 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1017925006 | ||
| 040 | |a MdBmJHUP |c MdBmJHUP | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Langford, Catherine L., |d 1974- |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Scalia v. Scalia : |b Opportunistic Textualism in Constitutional Interpretation / |c Catherine L. Langford. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Tuscaloosa : |b The University of Alabama Press, |c [2017] | |
| 264 | 3 | |a Baltimore, Md. : |b Project MUSE, |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©[2017] | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (176 pages). | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Rhetoric, law, and the humanities | |
| 520 | |a Scalia v. Scalia:Opportunistic Textualism in Constitutional Interpretation examines Scalia's discussions of textualism in his speeches, extrajudicial writings, and judicial opinions. Throughout his writings, Scalia argues textualism is the only acceptable form of constitutional interpretation. Yet Scalia does not clearly define his textualism, nor does he always rely upon textualism to the exclusion of other interpretive means. Scalia is seen as the standard bearer for textualism. But when textualism fails to support his ideological aims (as in cases that pertain to states' rights or separation of powers), Scalia reverts to other forms of argumentation. Langford analyzes Scalia's opinions in a clear area of law, the cruel and unusual punishment clause; a contested area of law, the free exercise and establishment cases; and a silent area of law, abortion. Through her analysis, Langford shows that Scalia uses rhetorical strategies beyond those of a textualist approach, concluding that Scalia is an opportunistic textualist and that textualism is as rhetorical as any other form of judicial interpretation. | ||
| 588 | |a Description based on print version record. | ||
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |a Scalia, Antonin, |d 1936-2016 |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00184458 |
| 600 | 1 | 0 | |a Scalia, Antonin, |d 1936-2016. |
| 650 | 7 | |a Constitutional law |x Philosophy. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00875821 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Constitutional law. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00875797 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Constitutional law |z United States |x Interpretation and construction. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Constitutional law |z United States |x Philosophy. | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Electronic books. |2 local | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Project Muse. |e distributor | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Book collections on Project MUSE. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |z Texto completo |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/57336/ |
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - 2018 Complete | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - 2018 Political Science and Policy Studies | ||