|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000004a 4500 |
001 |
musev2_49679 |
003 |
MdBmJHUP |
005 |
20230905045147.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr||||||||nn|n |
008 |
170113s2017 miu o 00 0 eng d |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781609175160
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781628952865
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781628962864
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781611863680
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781611862317
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)968303563
|
040 |
|
|
|a MdBmJHUP
|c MdBmJHUP
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Wanger, Eugene G.,
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Fighting the Death Penalty :
|b A Fifty-Year Journey of Argument and Persuasion /
|c Eugene G. Wanger.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a East Lansing :
|b Michigan State University Press,
|c [2017]
|
264 |
|
3 |
|a Baltimore, Md. :
|b Project MUSE,
|c 2017
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c ©[2017]
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (252 pages).
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Foreword, by Michael L. Radelet; Preface; 1. Committee Proposal 20 of the Legislative Powers Committee of the Michigan Constitutional Convention, Dated January 11, 1962 [authored by Mr. Wanger, it was adopted by the Convention with only three dissenting votes]; 2. Reasons in Support of Committee Proposal 20, Submitted by the Committee on Legislative Powers to the Convention on January 11, 1962 [authored by Mr. Wanger]; 3. Verbatim Debate of the Michigan Constitutional Convention on Committee Proposal 20, on January 16 and April 30, 1962, from its Official Record, 595-598, 2968.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a 4. Legislative Committee Hearing Testimony, March 15, 19735. Does the Parole Risk of Convicted Murderers Justify Reviving the Death Penalty in Michigan? (Leaflet), March, 1974; 6. Death-Ultimate Penalty-Proves Itself the Ultimate Injustice for All (Leaflet), April 30, 1974; 7. Michigan Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Hearing Testimony, February 10, 1975; 8. Death Ban Defended-Michigan Committee against Capital Punishment Press Release, April 7, 1975; 9. Michigan Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Hearing Testimony, April 7, 1975.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a 10. Why We Should Reject Capital Punishment (Pamphlet), 1978 [originally published by the Citizens Research Council of Michigan]11. Why Michigan Republicans Should Oppose the Death Penalty (Brochure), August, 1980 [for the Republican State Convention]; 12. Capital Punishment and Law Enforcement, September 26, 1975 [included in Brochure #11]; 13. Eye for Eye No Aid, by Michigan Lt. Governor James Brickley, 1974 [included in Brochure #11].
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a 14. Representative Assembly of the State Bar of Michigan Speech, September 23, 1982 [it subsequently voted to oppose repeal of the State's constitutional death penalty ban by a margin of more than 2 to 1]15. Michigan Committee Against Capital Punishment History (Leaflet), October, 1991; 16. The Death Penalty-What it Does to the Living, by William Kime and Eugene G. Wanger (Brochure), April, 1993; 17. Legislative Committee Hearing Testimony, September 8, 1994.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a 18. What Prosecutors Won't Tell You, by Robert M. Morgenthau (Leaflet), February, 1995 (America's most distinguished prosecutor) [Abstract]19. Legislative Committee Hearing Testimony, July 13, 1995; 20. Legislative Committee Hearing Written Testimony, October 7, 1997, with covering letter; 21. Will Innocent Persons Be Executed?-Another Perspective, by Michael Radelet (Leaflet), November, 1998; 22. Michigan's Historic Ban of Capital Punishment (Leaflet), December, 1998; 23. The Cot of Capital Punihment (Leaflet), December, 1998.
|
520 |
|
|
|a Michigan is the only state in the country that has a death penalty prohibition in its constitution -- Eugene G. Wanger's compelling arguments against capital punishment is a large reason it is there. The forty pieces in this volume are writings created or used by the author, who penned the prohibition clause, during his fifty years as a death penalty abolitionist. His extraordinary background in forensics, law, and political activity as constitutional convention delegate and co-chairman of the Michigan Committee Against Capital Punishment has produced a remarkable collection. It is not only a fifty-year history of the anti-death penalty argument in America, it also is a detailed and challenging example of how the argument against capital punishment may be successfully made.
|
588 |
|
|
|a Description based on print version record.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Capital punishment.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00846392
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a HISTORY
|z United States
|x State & Local
|x Midwest (IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, WI)
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Peine de mort
|z États-Unis.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Capital punishment
|z United States.
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a United States.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01204155
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Internet resources.
|2 lcgft
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Electronic books.
|2 local
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Project Muse.
|e distributor
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Texto completo
|u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/49679/
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - Custom Collection
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - 2017 Complete
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - 2017 Political Science and Policy Studies
|