Cargando…

The Fourth Amendement in Flux : The Roberts Court, Crime Crontrol, and Digital Privacy /

"When the Founders penned the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, it was not difficult to identify the "persons, houses, papers, and effects" they meant to protect; nor was it hard to understand what "unreasonable searches and seizures" were. The Fourth Amendment was inten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gizzi, Michael C. (Autor), Curtis, R. Craig (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2016]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_45792
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905044804.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 160107t20162016ksu o 00 0 eng d
010 |z  2016000656 
020 |a 9780700622580 
020 |z 9780700622573 
035 |a (OCoLC)949989490 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Gizzi, Michael C.,  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The Fourth Amendement in Flux :   |b The Roberts Court, Crime Crontrol, and Digital Privacy /   |c Michael C. Gizzi, R. Craig Curtis. 
264 1 |a Lawrence, Kansas :  |b University Press of Kansas,  |c [2016] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2016 
264 4 |c ©[2016] 
300 |a 1 online resource (208 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Explaining the Roberts court's Fourth Amendment jurisprudence -- Setting the stage -- The Burger court and the rise of a jurisprudence of crime control -- The war on drugs and the triumph of the Rehnquist court -- The Roberts court in flux -- The jurisprudence of crime control on the Roberts court -- Reining in the excesses of crime control -- Toward the future. 
520 |a "When the Founders penned the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, it was not difficult to identify the "persons, houses, papers, and effects" they meant to protect; nor was it hard to understand what "unreasonable searches and seizures" were. The Fourth Amendment was intended to stop the use of general warrants and writs of assistance and applied primarily to protect the home. Flash forward to a time of digital devices, automobiles, the war on drugs, and a Supreme Court dominated by several decades of the jurisprudence of crime control, and the legal meaning of everything from "effects" to "seizures" has dramatically changed. Michael C. Gizzi and R. Craig Curtis make sense of these changes in The Fourth Amendment in Flux. The book traces the development and application of search and seizure law and jurisprudence over time, with particular emphasis on decisions of the Roberts Court. Cell phones, GPS tracking devices, drones, wiretaps, the Patriot Act, constantly changing technology, and a political culture that emphasizes crime control create new challenges for Fourth Amendment interpretation and jurisprudence. This work exposes the tensions caused by attempts to apply pretechnological legal doctrine to modern problems of digital privacy. In their analysis of the Roberts Court's relevant decisions, Gizzi and Curtis document the different approaches to the law that have been applied by the justices since the Obama nominees took their seats on the court. Their account, combining law, political science, and history, provides insight into the court's small group dynamics, and traces changes regarding search and seizure law in the opinions of one of its longest serving members, Justice Antonin Scalia. At a time when issues of privacy are increasingly complicated by technological advances, this overview and analysis of Fourth Amendment law is especially welcome--an invaluable resource as we address the enduring question of how to balance freedom against security in the context of the challenges of the twenty-first century"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
650 7 |a Searches and seizures.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01110379 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Constitutions.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Constitutional.  |2 bisacsh 
650 0 |a Searches and seizures  |z United States  |v Cases. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Trials, litigation, etc.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01423712 
655 4 |a Cases. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
700 1 |a Curtis, R. Craig,  |e author. 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/45792/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2016 Complete 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2016 Political Science and Policy Studies