Cargando…

Sexual Injustice : Supreme Court Decisions from Griswold to Roe /

The U.S. Supreme Court of the 1960s and 1970s is typically celebrated by liberals and condemned by conservatives for its rulings on abortion, birth control, and other sexual matters. In this new work, historian Marc Stein demonstrates convincingly that both sides have it wrong. Focusing on six major...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stein, Marc (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Chapel Hill : The University of North Carolina Press, [2010]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_44152
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905044624.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 101101t20102010ncu o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9781469606279 
020 |z 9780807834121 
020 |z 9780807899373 
020 |z 9781469600888 
035 |a (OCoLC)966767926 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Stein, Marc,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Sexual Injustice :   |b Supreme Court Decisions from Griswold to Roe /   |c Marc Stein. 
264 1 |a Chapel Hill :  |b The University of North Carolina Press,  |c [2010] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2017 
264 4 |c ©[2010] 
300 |a 1 online resource (384 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Liberalization's limits from Griswold to Roe -- Consistent conservatism in Boutilier -- Liberalization's lawyers -- Boutilier's defenders -- Boutilier's defense -- Remembering Griswold to Roe -- Forgetting Boutilier -- Epilogue. 
520 |a The U.S. Supreme Court of the 1960s and 1970s is typically celebrated by liberals and condemned by conservatives for its rulings on abortion, birth control, and other sexual matters. In this new work, historian Marc Stein demonstrates convincingly that both sides have it wrong. Focusing on six major Supreme Court cases, Stein examines the more liberal rulings on birth control, abortion, interracial marriage, and obscenity in Griswold, Fanny Hill, Loving, Eisenstadt, and Roe alongside a profoundly conservative ruling on homosexuality in Boutilier. 
546 |a English. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
650 7 |a Sex and law.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01114252 
650 7 |a Gays  |x Legal status, laws, etc.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00939281 
650 7 |a Constitutional law.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00875797 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Public.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Constitutional.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Sexualite et droit  |z États-Unis  |v Jurisprudence. 
650 0 |a Gays  |x Legal status, laws, etc.  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Sex and law  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |z United States  |v Cases. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Trials, litigation, etc.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01423712 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/44152/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Complete Supplement V 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Political Science and Policy Studies Supplement V