Cargando…

Against Facts /

"In this book Arianna Betti argues that we have no good reason to accept facts in our catalog of the world, at least as they are described by the two major metaphysical theories of facts. She claims that neither of these theories is tenable--neither the theory according to which facts are speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Betti, Arianna, 1970- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: London, England : MIT Press, [2015]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_40920
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905044306.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 150717t20152015mau o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780262329644 
020 |z 0262029219 
020 |z 0262329646 
020 |z 9780262029216 
035 |a (OCoLC)913956516 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Betti, Arianna,  |d 1970-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Against Facts /   |c Arianna Betti. 
264 1 |a London, England :  |b MIT Press,  |c [2015] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2015 
264 4 |c ©[2015] 
300 |a 1 online resource (328 pages):   |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 0 |g I.  |t Compositional facts --  |g 1.  |t Compositional facts --  |g 2.  |t The unity problem --  |g 3.  |t Solving the unity problem --  |g II.  |t Propositional facts --  |g 4.  |t Reductio --  |g 5.  |t A fallback position, 1 --  |g 6.  |t A fallback position, 2 --  |t Conclusion : farewell to facts. 
520 |a "In this book Arianna Betti argues that we have no good reason to accept facts in our catalog of the world, at least as they are described by the two major metaphysical theories of facts. She claims that neither of these theories is tenable--neither the theory according to which facts are special structured building blocks of reality nor the theory according to which facts are whatever is named by certain expressions of the form 'the fact that such and such.' There is reality, and there are entities in reality that we are able to name, but, Betti contends, among these entities there are no facts. Drawing on metaphysics, the philosophy of language, and linguistics, Betti examines the main arguments in favor of and against facts of the two major sorts, which she distinguishes as compositional and propositional, giving special attention to methodological presuppositions. She criticizes compositional facts (facts as special structured building blocks of reality) and the central argument for them, Armstrong's truthmaker argument. She then criticizes propositional facts (facts as whatever is named in "the fact that" statements) and what she calls the argument from nominal reference, which draws on Quine's criterion of ontological commitment. Betti argues that metaphysicians should stop worrying about facts, and philosophers in general should stop arguing for or against entities on the basis of how we use language"--MIT CogNet 
546 |a English. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Facts (Philosophy)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00919797 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x Metaphysics.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Faits (Philosophie) 
650 0 |a Facts (Philosophy) 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/40920/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2015 Philosophy and Religion 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2015 Complete