Cargando…

Knowledge and Justification /

One of the most firmly entrenched beliefs of contemporary philosophy is that the only way to analyze a concept is to state its truth conditions. In epistemology this has led to the search for reductive analyses, to phenomenalism, behaviorism, and their analogues in other areas of knowledge. Arguing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pollock, John L. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press, 1974.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_38548
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905044041.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 150218t19741974nju o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9781400870738 
020 |z 9780691645285 
020 |z 9780691072036 
020 |z 9780691618272 
035 |a (OCoLC)933515935 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Pollock, John L.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Knowledge and Justification /   |c John L. Pollock. 
264 1 |a Princeton, New Jersey :  |b Princeton University Press,  |c 1974. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2016 
264 4 |c ©1974. 
300 |a 1 online resource (362 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Princeton Legacy Library 
505 0 |a 1. What Is an Epistemological Problem?; 2. The Structure of Epistemic Justification; 3. Theories of Perceptual Knowledge; 4. Incorrigibility; 5. Perceptual Attributes; 6. The Reidentification of Physical Things; 7. Memory and Historical Knowledge; 8. Induction; 9. The Concept of a Person; 10. Truths of Reason. 
520 |a One of the most firmly entrenched beliefs of contemporary philosophy is that the only way to analyze a concept is to state its truth conditions. In epistemology this has led to the search for reductive analyses, to phenomenalism, behaviorism, and their analogues in other areas of knowledge. Arguing that these attempts at reductive analysis have invariably failed, John L. Pollock defends an alternative theory of conceptual analysis in this book. The author suggests that concepts should be analyzed in terms of their justification conditions rather than their truth conditions. After laying a th. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Perception.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01057622 
650 7 |a Knowledge, Theory of.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00988194 
650 7 |a Concepts.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00872969 
650 7 |a Analysis (Philosophy)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00808323 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x Epistemology.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a PSYCHOLOGY  |x Developmental  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a epistemology.  |2 aat 
650 6 |a Perception. 
650 6 |a Philosophie analytique. 
650 6 |a Concepts. 
650 6 |a Theorie de la connaissance. 
650 2 |a Perception 
650 0 |a Perception. 
650 0 |a Analysis (Philosophy) 
650 0 |a Concepts. 
650 0 |a Knowledge, Theory of. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/38548/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Complete Supplement IV 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Psychology Supplement