MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_38058
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905044011.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 100626s2004 kyu o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780813156743 
020 |z 9780813171975 
020 |z 9780813189338 
020 |z 9780813123356 
035 |a (OCoLC)644300558 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Farrier, Jasmine,  |d 1970- 
245 1 0 |a Passing the Buck :   |b Congress, the Budget, and Deficits /   |c Jasmine Farrier. 
264 1 |a Lexington :  |b University Press of Kentucky,  |c 2004. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2016 
264 4 |c ©2004. 
300 |a 1 online resource (296 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Origins and significance of delegation of power -- Reforming the reforms : a brief history of congressional budgeting -- 1974 Budget Act : Congress takes control -- Congress attacks deficits (and itself) with Gramm-Rudman-Hollings -- Old problems and new tools of self-restraint : the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 -- Stop us before we spend again : the Line-Item Veto Act of 1996 -- Conclusions. 
520 8 |a Annotation  |b In the past thirty years, Congress has dramatically changed its response to unpopular deficit spending. While the landmark Congressional Budget Act of 1974 tried to increase congressional budgeting powers, new budget processes created in the 1980s and 1990s were all explicitly designed to weaken member, majority, and institutional budgeting prerogatives. These later reforms shared the premise that Congress cannot naturally forge balanced budgets without new automatic mechanisms and enhanced presidential oversight. So Democratic majorities in Congress gave new budgeting powers to Presidents Reagan and Bush, and then Republicans did the same for President Clinton. Passing the Buck examines how Congress is increasing delegation of a wide variety of powers to the president in recent years. Jasmine Farrier assesses why institutional ambition in the early 1970s turned into institutional ambivalence about whether Congress is equipped to handle its constitutional duties. 
546 |a English. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
610 1 7 |a USA  |b Congress  |2 gnd 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Congress.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529490 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Congress  |x Pouvoirs et fonctions. 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Congress  |x Reforme. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Congress  |x Powers and duties. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Congress  |x Reform. 
650 7 |a Haushaltsplan  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Reform  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Finanzpolitik  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Defizit  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Legislative power.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00995815 
650 7 |a Legislative bodies  |x Reform.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00995742 
650 7 |a Finance, Public.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00924477 
650 7 |a Budget process.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00840424 
650 7 |a Budget deficits.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00840404 
650 7 |a Budget.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00840336 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x Legislative Branch.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Deficit budgetaire  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Finances publiques  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Processus budgetaire  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Budget  |z États-Unis. 
650 0 |a Budget deficits  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Finance, Public  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Budget process  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Budget  |z United States. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/38058/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Complete Supplement IV 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Political Science and Policy Studies Supplement IV