|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000004a 4500 |
001 |
musev2_37002 |
003 |
MdBmJHUP |
005 |
20230905043904.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr||||||||nn|n |
008 |
150216r20152015mnu o 00 0 eng d |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781451494303
|
020 |
|
|
|z 1451490224
|
020 |
|
|
|z 1451494300
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781451490220
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)903985799
|
040 |
|
|
|a MdBmJHUP
|c MdBmJHUP
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a BS2585.52
|b .K654 2015
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 226.3/06
|2 23
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Kok, Michael J.,
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a The Gospel on the Margins :
|b The Reception of Mark in the Second Century /
|c Michael J. Kok.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Baltimore, Maryland :
|b Project Muse,
|c 2015
|
264 |
|
3 |
|a Baltimore, Md. :
|b Project MUSE,
|c 2015
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c ©2015
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (240 pages).
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Issued as part of book collections on Project MUSE.
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 301-327) and indexes.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Abbreviations -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- The construction of Mark as the interpreter of Peter -- The decline of the Patristic consensus -- The re-emergence of the Patristic tradition -- From Paul's fellow worker to Peter's interpreter -- The ideological function of the Patristic tradition -- Toward a theory of the Patristic reception of Mark -- The gospel on the margins of the canon -- The clash of rival interpreters -- Conclusion : the centrist Christian appropriation of Mark -- Appendix. The Carpocratians and the Mystic Gospel of Mark.
|
506 |
|
|
|a Access restricted to authorized users and institutions.
|
520 |
|
|
|a Scholars of the Gospel of Mark usually discuss the merits of patristic references to the Gospel's origin and Mark's identity as the "interpreter" of Peter. But while the question of the Gospel's historical origins draws attention, no one has asked why, despite virtually unanimous patristic association of the Gospel with Peter, one of the most prestigious apostolic founding figures in Christian memory, Mark's Gospel was mostly neglected by those same writers. Not only is the text of Mark the least represented of the canonical Gospels in patristic citations, commentaries, and manuscripts, but the explicit comments about the Evangelist reveal ambivalence about Mark's literary or theological value. Michael J. Kok surveys the second-century reception of Mark, from Papias of Hierapolis to Clement of Alexandria, and finds that the patristic writers were hesitant to embrace Mark because they perceived it to be too easily adapted to rival Christian factions. Kok describes the story of Mark's Petrine origins as a second-century move to assert ownership of the Gospel on the part of the emerging Orthodox Church.
|
588 |
|
|
|a Description based on print version record.
|
630 |
0 |
0 |
|a Bible.
|p Mark
|x Criticism, interpretation, etc.
|x History
|y Early church, ca. 30-600.
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Electronic books.
|2 local
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Project Muse,
|e distributor.
|
776 |
1 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|z 1451490224
|z 9781451490220
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Project Muse.
|e distributor
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Texto completo
|u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/37002/
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - Custom Collection
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - 2015 Philosophy and Religion
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - 2015 Complete
|