Cargando…

Striking First : Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict /

Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an attack is in progress? Is the Bush Doctrine of aggressive preventive action a justified and legal recourse against threats posed by terrorists and rogue states? Tackling one of the most controversial p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Doyle, Michael W., 1948- (Autor)
Otros Autores: Macedo, Stephen, 1957- (Editor )
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 2008.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_36241
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905043818.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 090928s2008 nju o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9781400829637 
020 |z 9780691136585 
020 |z 9780691149967 
035 |a (OCoLC)440770991 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Doyle, Michael W.,  |d 1948-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Striking First :   |b Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict /   |c Michael W. Doyle ; edited and introduced by Stephen Macedo ; with commentary by Harold Hongju Koh, Richard Tuck, Jeff McMahan. 
264 1 |a Princeton, NJ :  |b Princeton University Press,  |c 2008. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2016 
264 4 |c ©2008. 
300 |a 1 online resource (216 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a The University Center for Human Values series 
505 0 |a Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction; Striking First; International Law and Current Standards; Standards; Comment; Comment; Comment; Response to Commentators; Contributors; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; Q; R; S; T; U; V; W; Y. 
520 |a Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an attack is in progress? Is the Bush Doctrine of aggressive preventive action a justified and legal recourse against threats posed by terrorists and rogue states? Tackling one of the most controversial policy issues of the post-September 11 world, Michael Doyle argues that neither the Bush Doctrine nor customary international law is capable of adequately responding to the pressing security threats of our times. In Striking First, Doyle shows how the Bush Doctrine has consistently disregarded a vita. 
546 |a English. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 1 7 |a Nationale veiligheid.  |2 gtt 
650 1 7 |a Militaire strategie.  |2 gtt 
650 1 7 |a Internationale conflicten.  |2 gtt 
650 7 |a War (International law)  |x Philosophy.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01170416 
650 7 |a Sanctions (International law)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01104789 
650 7 |a Preemptive attack (Military science)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01075045 
650 7 |a National security.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01033711 
650 7 |a Intervention (International law)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00977583 
650 7 |a LAW  |x International.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Guerre (Droit international)  |x Philosophie. 
650 6 |a Attaque preventive (Science militaire) 
650 6 |a Sanctions (Droit international) 
650 6 |a Intervention (Droit international) 
650 0 |a National security  |z United States. 
650 0 |a War (International law)  |x Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Preemptive attack (Military science) 
650 0 |a Sanctions (International law) 
650 0 |a Intervention (International law) 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
700 1 |a Macedo, Stephen,  |d 1957-  |e editor,  |e writer of introduction. 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/36241/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Complete Supplement IV 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Political Science and Policy Studies Supplement IV