Cargando…

Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy : The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History /

Should the Supreme Court have the last word when it comes to interpreting the Constitution? The justices on the Supreme Court certainly seem to think so--and their critics say that this position threatens democracy. But Keith Whittington argues that the Court's justices have not simply seized p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Whittington, Keith E.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 2007.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_36233
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905043818.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 101103s2007 nju o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9781400827756 
020 |z 9780691141022 
020 |z 9780691096407 
035 |a (OCoLC)677147615 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Whittington, Keith E. 
245 1 0 |a Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy :   |b The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History /   |c Keith E. Whittington. 
264 1 |a Princeton, N.J. :  |b Princeton University Press,  |c 2007. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2016 
264 4 |c ©2007. 
300 |a 1 online resource (320 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Princeton studies in American politics 
505 0 |a The politics of constitutional meaning -- The construction of constitutional regimes -- The reconstruction of judicial authority -- The judiciary in the politics of opposition -- The growth of judicial authority -- The dynamics of constitutional authority. 
520 |a Should the Supreme Court have the last word when it comes to interpreting the Constitution? The justices on the Supreme Court certainly seem to think so--and their critics say that this position threatens democracy. But Keith Whittington argues that the Court's justices have not simply seized power and circumvented politics. The justices have had power thrust upon them--by politicians, for the benefit of politicians. In this sweeping political history of judicial supremacy in America, Whittington shows that presidents and political leaders of all stripes have worked to put the Court on a pe. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
650 7 |a Political questions and judicial power.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01069674 
650 7 |a Judicial review.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984727 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x American Government  |x Judicial Branch.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Civil Procedure.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Legal Services.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x Judicial Branch.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Contrôle juridictionnel des lois  |z États-Unis. 
650 0 |a Political questions and judicial power  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Judicial review  |z United States. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/36233/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Complete Supplement IV 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Political Science and Policy Studies Supplement IV