Cargando…

Ostension : Word Learning and the Embodied Mind /

"Ostension is bodily movement that manifests our engagement with things, whether we wish it to or not. Gestures, glances, facial expressions: all betray our interest in something. Ostension enables our first word learning, providing infants with a prelinguistic way to grasp the meaning of words...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Engelland, Chad (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press, [2014]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_35820
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905043752.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 141118t20142014mau o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780262320610 
020 |z 9780262028097 
020 |z 0262320614 
020 |z 0262028093 
035 |a (OCoLC)895773007 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Engelland, Chad,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Ostension :   |b Word Learning and the Embodied Mind /   |c Chad Engelland. 
264 1 |a Cambridge, Massachusetts :  |b The MIT Press,  |c [2014] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2014 
264 4 |c ©[2014] 
300 |a 1 online resource (328 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 0 |t Introduction : minding ostension --  |t The philosophy of action, perception, and play --  |t The science of prelinguistic joint attention --  |t Wittgenstein : ostension makes language public --  |t Merleau-Ponty : gestural meaning and the living body --  |t Augustine : word learning by understanding the movements of life --  |t Aristotle : natural movement and the problem of shared understanding --  |t Phenomenology : discovering ostension --  |t Mind: the logic of ostension --  |t Epistemology : disambiguating ostension --  |t Metaphysics : movement, manifestation, and language --  |t Conclusion : the origin of the human conversation. 
520 |6 880-01  |a "Ostension is bodily movement that manifests our engagement with things, whether we wish it to or not. Gestures, glances, facial expressions: all betray our interest in something. Ostension enables our first word learning, providing infants with a prelinguistic way to grasp the meaning of words. Ostension is philosophically puzzling; it cuts across domains seemingly unbridgeable--public--private, inner--outer, mind--body. In this book, Chad Engelland offers a philosophical investigation of ostension and its role in word learning by infants. Engelland discusses ostension (distinguishing it from ostensive definition) in contemporary philosophy, examining accounts by Quine, Davidson, and Gadamer, and he explores relevant empirical findings in psychology, evolutionary anthropology, and neuroscience. He offers original studies of four representative historical thinkers whose work enriches the understanding of ostension: Wittgenstein, Merleau-Ponty, Augustine, and Aristotle. And, building on these philosophical and empirical foundations, Engelland offers a meticulous analysis of the philosophical issues raised by ostension. He examines the phenomenological problem of whether embodied intentions are manifest or inferred; the problem of what concept of mind allows ostensive cues to be intersubjectively available; the epistemological problem of how ostensive cues, notoriously ambiguous, can be correctly understood; and the metaphysical problem of the ultimate status of the key terms in his argument: animate movement, language, and mind. Finally, he argues for the centrality of manifestation in philosophy. Taking ostension seriously, he proposes, has far-reaching implications for thinking about language and the practice of philosophy"--MIT CogNet 
546 |a English. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Psycholinguistics.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01081323 
650 7 |a Neurophysiology.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01036464 
650 7 |a Language awareness.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00992358 
650 7 |a Language acquisition.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00992119 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x Movements  |x Phenomenology.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a psycholinguistics.  |2 aat 
650 6 |a Psycholinguistique. 
650 6 |a Neurophysiologie. 
650 6 |a Langage  |x Acquisition. 
650 6 |a Conscience linguistique. 
650 2 |a Psycholinguistics 
650 2 |a Neurophysiology 
650 2 |a Language Development 
650 0 |a Psycholinguistics. 
650 0 |a Neurophysiology. 
650 0 |a Language acquisition. 
650 0 |a Language awareness. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
880 |6 520-01/(3/r  |a "Ostension is bodily movement that manifests our engagement with things, whether we wish it to or not. Gestures, glances, facial expressions: all betray our interest in something. Ostension enables our first word learning, providing infants with a prelinguistic way to grasp the meaning of words. Ostension is philosophically puzzling; it cuts across domains seemingly unbridgeable--publicئprivate, innerئouter, mindئbody. In this book, Chad Engelland offers a philosophical investigation of ostension and its role in word learning by infants. Engelland discusses ostension (distinguishing it from ostensive definition) in contemporary philosophy, examining accounts by Quine, Davidson, and Gadamer, and he explores relevant empirical findings in psychology, evolutionary anthropology, and neuroscience. He offers original studies of four representative historical thinkers whose work enriches the understanding of ostension: Wittgenstein, Merleau-Ponty, Augustine, and Aristotle. And, building on these philosophical and empirical foundations, Engelland offers a meticulous analysis of the philosophical issues raised by ostension. He examines the phenomenological problem of whether embodied intentions are manifest or inferred; the problem of what concept of mind allows ostensive cues to be intersubjectively available; the epistemological problem of how ostensive cues, notoriously ambiguous, can be correctly understood; and the metaphysical problem of the ultimate status of the key terms in his argument: animate movement, language, and mind. Finally, he argues for the centrality of manifestation in philosophy. Taking ostension seriously, he proposes, has far-reaching implications for thinking about language and the practice of philosophy"--MIT CogNet 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/35820/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2014 Higher Education 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2014 Complete