Cargando…
Pro-Life, Pro-Choice : Shared Values in the Abortion Debate /
"Debates the pro-choice versus pro-life stance on abortion. Examines the legal status of the fetus in the recent Personhood Amendments in state legislatures and in Supreme Court decisions, and asks whether Roe v. Wade should have focused on the viability of the fetus or on the bodily integrity...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Nashville :
Vanderbilt University Press,
[2014]
|
| Colección: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000004a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | musev2_32725 | ||
| 003 | MdBmJHUP | ||
| 005 | 20230905043441.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr||||||||nn|n | ||
| 008 | 130830s2014 tnu o 00 0 eng d | ||
| 010 | |z 2013034847 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780826519924 | ||
| 020 | |z 9780826519900 | ||
| 020 | |z 9780826502926 | ||
| 020 | |z 9780826519917 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)884595330 | ||
| 040 | |a MdBmJHUP |c MdBmJHUP | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Manninen, Bertha Alvarez, |d 1977- | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pro-Life, Pro-Choice : |b Shared Values in the Abortion Debate / |c Bertha Alvarez Manninen. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Nashville : |b Vanderbilt University Press, |c [2014] | |
| 264 | 3 | |a Baltimore, Md. : |b Project MUSE, |c 2014 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©[2014] | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (240 pages). | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Why Roe v. Wade's argument fails -- Responsibility and other worries -- Of women and fetuses: battling the false dichotomy -- Pro-choice, not pro-abortion: rethinking the pro-choice strategy -- A pro-choice moral framework -- Respecting fetal life and pregnant women: building upon shared values -- The forgotten father: men and abortion. | |
| 520 | |a "Debates the pro-choice versus pro-life stance on abortion. Examines the legal status of the fetus in the recent Personhood Amendments in state legislatures and in Supreme Court decisions, and asks whether Roe v. Wade should have focused on the viability of the fetus or on the bodily integrity of the woman"-- |c Provided by publisher | ||
| 588 | |a Description based on print version record. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Society. |2 ukslc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Central |x national |x federal government policies. |2 thema | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ethics & moral philosophy. |2 thema | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Birth control, contraception, family planning. |2 thema | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ethical issues & debates. |2 thema | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Abortion |x Moral and ethical aspects. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00794606 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Abortion |x Law and legislation. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00794598 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Central government policies. |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ethics & moral philosophy. |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ethical issues: abortion & birth control. |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Avortement |x Aspect moral |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 1 | 2 | |a Abortion, Induced |x legislation & jurisprudence |
| 650 | 1 | 2 | |a Abortion, Induced |x ethics |
| 650 | 0 | |a Abortion |x Law and legislation |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Abortion |x Moral and ethical aspects |z United States. | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 | |
| 651 | 2 | |a United States | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Electronic books. |2 local | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Project Muse. |e distributor | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Book collections on Project MUSE. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |z Texto completo |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/32725/ |
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - 2014 Complete | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - 2014 Global Cultural Studies | ||