Cargando…

Democratic Authority : A Philosophical Framework /

Democracy is not naturally plausible. Why turn such important matters over to masses of people who have no expertise? Many theories of democracy answer by appealing to the intrinsic value of democratic procedure, leaving aside whether it makes good decisions. In Democratic Authority, David Estlund o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Estlund, David M.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 2008.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_30027
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905043158.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 070323s2008 nju o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9781400831548 
020 |z 9780691124179 
020 |z 9780691143248 
035 |a (OCoLC)647843193 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Estlund, David M. 
245 1 0 |a Democratic Authority :   |b A Philosophical Framework /   |c David M. Estlund. 
264 1 |a Princeton, N.J. :  |b Princeton University Press,  |c 2008. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2015 
264 4 |c ©2008. 
300 |a 1 online resource (312 pages):   |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Democratic authority -- Truth and despotism -- An acceptability requirement -- The limits of fair procedure -- The flight from substance -- Epistemic proceduralism -- Authority and normative consent -- Original authority and the democracy/jury analogy -- How would democracy know? -- The real speech situation -- Why not an epistocracy of the educated? -- The irrelevance of the jury theorem -- Rejecting the democracy/contractualism analogy -- Utopophobia : concession and aspiration in democratic theory. 
520 |a Democracy is not naturally plausible. Why turn such important matters over to masses of people who have no expertise? Many theories of democracy answer by appealing to the intrinsic value of democratic procedure, leaving aside whether it makes good decisions. In Democratic Authority, David Estlund offers a groundbreaking alternative based on the idea that democratic authority and legitimacy must depend partly on democracy's tendency to make good decisions. Just as with verdicts in jury trials, Estlund argues, the authority and legitimacy of a political decision does not depend on the particular. 
546 |a English. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Democracy  |x Philosophy.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00890092 
650 7 |a Democracy.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00890077 
650 7 |a Authority.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00821653 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x American Government  |x Judicial Branch.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Political Ideologies  |x Democracy.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Autorite. 
650 0 |a Democracy. 
650 0 |a Democracy  |x Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Authority. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/30027/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Complete Supplement III 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Political Science and Policy Studies Supplement III