Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs?

Mostrar otras versiones (3)

Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include all...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Franck, Thomas M.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2012.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Separation of powers.
Political questions and judicial power.
National security > Law and legislation.
Judicial review.
Diplomatic relations.
Courts.
LAW > Legal History.
Separation des pouvoirs > États-Unis.
Politique et pouvoir judiciaire > États-Unis.
Contrôle juridictionnel des lois > États-Unis.
Separation of powers > United States.
Political questions and judicial power > United States.
National security > Law and legislation > United States.
Judicial review > United States.
Courts > United States.
United States.
États-Unis > Relations exterieures.
United States > Foreign relations.
Electronic books.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgments; Chapter One: Introduction; Chapter Two: How Abdication Crept into the Judicial Repertory; The Faustian Pact; Double-Entry Bookkeeping; Chapter Three: Two Principled Theories of Constitutionalism; Chapter Four: Prudential Reasons for Judicial Abdication; The Factual Evidence Is Too Difficult; No Applicable Legal Standards; Too Much at Stake; Judges Cannot Compel the Executive; Chapter Five: When Judges Refuse to Abdicate; Security and Foreign-Policy Interests v. Property Rights; Security and Foreign-Policy Interests v. Civil Rights.
  • Congressional v. Executive PowersChapter Six: Mandated Adjudication: Act of State and Sovereign Immunity; Act of State; Foreign Sovereign Immunity; Chapter Seven: Abolishing Judicial Abdication: The German Model; German Judges on Whether to Decide; German Judges on How to Decide; Chapter Eight: A Rule of Evidence in Place of the Political-Question Doctrine; Evidentiary Weight; Chapter Nine: The Special Cases: In Camera Proceedings and Declaratory Judgments; The Need to Preserve Secrecy; The Less Confrontational Remedy: Declaratory Judgment.
  • Chapter Ten: Conclusions: Does the Rule of Law Stop at the Water's Edge?Notes; Index.

Ejemplares similares