Cargando…
Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs?
Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include all...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Princeton :
Princeton University Press,
2012.
|
| Colección: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000004a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | musev2_29858 | ||
| 003 | MdBmJHUP | ||
| 005 | 20230905043147.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr||||||||nn|n | ||
| 008 | 121121s2012 nju o 00 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781400820733 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781400802449 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781400802425 | ||
| 020 | |z 9780691092416 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781400815920 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781400802432 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781400811649 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)51328409 | ||
| 040 | |a MdBmJHUP |c MdBmJHUP | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Franck, Thomas M. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Political Questions Judicial Answers : |b Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? |
| 264 | 1 | |a Princeton : |b Princeton University Press, |c 2012. | |
| 264 | 3 | |a Baltimore, Md. : |b Project MUSE, |c 2015 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2012. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (212 pages). | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgments; Chapter One: Introduction; Chapter Two: How Abdication Crept into the Judicial Repertory; The Faustian Pact; Double-Entry Bookkeeping; Chapter Three: Two Principled Theories of Constitutionalism; Chapter Four: Prudential Reasons for Judicial Abdication; The Factual Evidence Is Too Difficult; No Applicable Legal Standards; Too Much at Stake; Judges Cannot Compel the Executive; Chapter Five: When Judges Refuse to Abdicate; Security and Foreign-Policy Interests v. Property Rights; Security and Foreign-Policy Interests v. Civil Rights. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Congressional v. Executive PowersChapter Six: Mandated Adjudication: Act of State and Sovereign Immunity; Act of State; Foreign Sovereign Immunity; Chapter Seven: Abolishing Judicial Abdication: The German Model; German Judges on Whether to Decide; German Judges on How to Decide; Chapter Eight: A Rule of Evidence in Place of the Political-Question Doctrine; Evidentiary Weight; Chapter Nine: The Special Cases: In Camera Proceedings and Declaratory Judgments; The Need to Preserve Secrecy; The Less Confrontational Remedy: Declaratory Judgment. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Chapter Ten: Conclusions: Does the Rule of Law Stop at the Water's Edge?Notes; Index. | |
| 520 | |a Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include allegations that the President, or Congress, has violated a law or the Constitution itself. Most of these orphan cases are shunned by the judiciary simply because they have foreign policy aspects. In refusing to address the issues involved, judges indicate that judicial review, like politics, should stop at the water's edge--and foreign policy managers find it convenient to agree! Thomas Franck, however, maintains that when courts invoke the "political question" doctrine to justify such reticence, they evade a constitutional duty. In his view, whether the government has acted constitutionally in sending men and women to die in foreign battles is just as appropriate an issue for a court to decide as whether property has been taken without due process. In this revisionist work, Franck proposes ways to subject the conduct of foreign policy to the rule of law without compromising either judicial integrity or the national interest. By examining the historical origins of the separation of powers in the American constitutional tradition, with comparative reference to the practices of judiciaries in other federal systems, he broadens and enriches discussions of an important national issue that has particular significance for critical debate about the "imperial presidency." | ||
| 588 | |a Description based on print version record. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Separation of powers. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01112740 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Political questions and judicial power. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01069674 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a National security |x Law and legislation. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01033727 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Judicial review. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00984727 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Diplomatic relations. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01907412 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Courts. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00881747 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Legal History. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Separation des pouvoirs |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Contrôle juridictionnel des lois |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Separation of powers |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Political questions and judicial power |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a National security |x Law and legislation |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Judicial review |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Courts |z United States. | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 | |
| 651 | 6 | |a États-Unis |x Relations exterieures. | |
| 651 | 0 | |a United States |x Foreign relations. | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Electronic books. |2 local | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Project Muse. |e distributor | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Book collections on Project MUSE. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |z Texto completo |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/29858/ |
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - Archive Complete Supplement III | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - Archive Political Science and Policy Studies Supplement III | ||