Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings in the U.S. Senate : Reconsidering the Charade /
Critics claim that Supreme Court nominees have become more evasive in recent decades and that Senate confirmation hearings lack real substance. Conducting a line-by-line analysis of the confirmation hearing of every nominee since 1955-an original dataset of nearly 11,000 questions and answers from t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Ann Arbor :
The University of Michigan Press,
[2014]
|
Colección: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- A vapid and hollow charade?
- The hearings in historical perspective
- Coding the hearings
- Are Supreme Court nominees forthcoming?
- Polarized and televised: changes in committee voting since 1981
- The perception gap
- Can the hearings be improved? Do they need to be?