Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings in the U.S. Senate : Reconsidering the Charade /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

Critics claim that Supreme Court nominees have become more evasive in recent decades and that Senate confirmation hearings lack real substance. Conducting a line-by-line analysis of the confirmation hearing of every nominee since 1955-an original dataset of nearly 11,000 questions and answers from t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farganis, Dion (Autor), Wedeking, Justin (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Ann Arbor : The University of Michigan Press, [2014]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
United States. > Supreme Court.
United States. > Congress. > Senate. > Committee on the Judiciary.
États-Unis. > Supreme Court > Fonctionnaires > Selection et nomination.
United States. > Supreme Court > Officials and employees > Selection and appointment.
Law - U.S. - General.
Law, Politics & Government.
Law - U.S.
Legislative hearings.
Judges > Selection and appointment.
POLITICAL SCIENCE > American Government > Judicial Branch.
POLITICAL SCIENCE > Government > Legislative Branch.
Commissions parlementaires > Audiences > États-Unis.
Legislative hearings > United States.
Judges > Selection and appointment > United States.
United States.
Electronic books.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_29519
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905043126.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 140418s2014 miu o 00 0 eng d
010 |z  2013048569 
020 |a 9780472120277 
020 |z 9780472119332 
035 |a (OCoLC)877049852 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Farganis, Dion,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings in the U.S. Senate :   |b Reconsidering the Charade /   |c Dion Farganis and Justin Wedeking. 
264 1 |a Ann Arbor :  |b The University of Michigan Press,  |c [2014] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2014 
264 4 |c ©[2014] 
300 |a 1 online resource (174 pages):   |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a A vapid and hollow charade? -- The hearings in historical perspective -- Coding the hearings -- Are Supreme Court nominees forthcoming? -- Polarized and televised: changes in committee voting since 1981 -- The perception gap -- Can the hearings be improved? Do they need to be? 
520 |a Critics claim that Supreme Court nominees have become more evasive in recent decades and that Senate confirmation hearings lack real substance. Conducting a line-by-line analysis of the confirmation hearing of every nominee since 1955-an original dataset of nearly 11,000 questions and answers from testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee-Dion Farganis and Justin Wedeking discover that nominees are far more forthcoming than generally assumed. Applying an original scoring system to assess each nominee's testimony based on the same criteria, they show that some of the earliest nominees wer. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Congress.  |b Senate.  |b Committee on the Judiciary.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00576609 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Supreme Court  |x Fonctionnaires  |x Selection et nomination. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Congress.  |b Senate.  |b Committee on the Judiciary. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |x Officials and employees  |x Selection and appointment. 
650 7 |a Law - U.S. - General.  |2 hilcc 
650 7 |a Law, Politics & Government.  |2 hilcc 
650 7 |a Law - U.S.  |2 hilcc 
650 7 |a Legislative hearings.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00995801 
650 7 |a Judges  |x Selection and appointment.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984544 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x American Government  |x Judicial Branch.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x Legislative Branch.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Commissions parlementaires  |x Audiences  |z États-Unis. 
650 0 |a Legislative hearings  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Judges  |x Selection and appointment  |z United States. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
700 1 |a Wedeking, Justin,  |e author. 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/29519/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2014 Political Science and Policy Studies 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2014 Complete 

Ejemplares similares