Cargando…
Disabled Education : A Critical Analysis of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act /
"Enacted in 1975, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act - now called the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides all children with the right to a free and appropriate public education. On the face of it, the IDEA is a shining example of law's democratizing impu...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
New York :
New York University Press,
[2013]
|
| Colección: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000004a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | musev2_26370 | ||
| 003 | MdBmJHUP | ||
| 005 | 20230905042811.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr||||||||nn|n | ||
| 008 | 121108s2013 nyu o 00 0 eng d | ||
| 010 | |z 2012045597 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780814708002 | ||
| 020 | |z 9780814708101 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)836870570 | ||
| 040 | |a MdBmJHUP |c MdBmJHUP | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Colker, Ruth. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Disabled Education : |b A Critical Analysis of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act / |c Ruth Colker. |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York : |b New York University Press, |c [2013] | |
| 264 | 3 | |a Baltimore, Md. : |b Project MUSE, |c 2013 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©[2013] | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (293 pages). | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Introduction -- The Education for All Handicapped Children Act: historical evolution -- Amy Rowley -- Michael Panico -- Post-1975 amendments -- Brian Schaffer -- Joseph Murphy -- Ohio -- Florida -- New Jersey -- California -- District of Columbia -- The learning disability mess -- A new beginning. | |
| 520 | |a "Enacted in 1975, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act - now called the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides all children with the right to a free and appropriate public education. On the face of it, the IDEA is a shining example of law's democratizing impulse. But is that really the case? In Disabled Education, Ruth Colker digs deep beneath the IDEA's surface and reveals that the IDEA contains flaws that were evident at the time of its enactment that limit its effectiveness for poor and minority children. Both an expert in disability law and the mother of a child with a hearing impairment, Colker learned first-hand of the Act's limitations when she embarked on a legal battle to persuade her son's school to accommodate his impairment. Colker was able to devote the considerable resources of a middle-class lawyer to her struggle and ultimately won, but she knew that the IDEA would not have benefitted her son without her time-consuming and costly legal intervention. Her experience led her to investigate other cases, which confirmed her suspicions that the IDEA best serves those with the resources to advocate strongly for their children. The IDEA also works only as well as the rest of the system does: struggling schools that serve primarily poor students of color rarely have the funds to provide appropriate special education and related services to their students with disabilities. Through a close examination of the historical evolution of the IDEA, the actual experiences of children who fought for their education in court, and social science literature on the meaning of "learning disability," Colker reveals the IDEA's shortcomings, but also suggests ways in which resources might be allocated more evenly along class lines."--Publisher's description. | ||
| 520 | |a Overview: Enacted in 1975, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides all children with the right to a free and appropriate public education. On the face of it, the IDEA is a shining example of law's democratizing impulse. But is that really the case? In Disabled Education, Ruth Colker digs deep beneath the IDEA's surface and reveals that the IDEA contains flaws that were evident at the time of its enactment that limit its effectiveness for poor and minority children. Through an examination of the evolution of the IDEA, the experiences of children who fought for their education in court, and social science literature on the meaning of "learning disability," Colker reveals the IDEA's shortcomings, but also suggests ways in which resources might be allocated more evenly along class lines. | ||
| 588 | |a Description based on print version record. | ||
| 610 | 1 | 7 | |a United States. |t Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. |2 nli |
| 610 | 1 | 0 | |a United States. |t Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. |
| 650 | 7 | |a Children with disabilities |x Education |x Law and legislation |z United States. |2 nli | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Children with disabilities |x Education |x Law and legislation. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00855568 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a special education. |2 aat | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Enfants handicapes. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Éducation speciale. | |
| 650 | 2 | 2 | |a Legislation as Topic |
| 650 | 2 | 2 | |a Disabled Children |
| 650 | 1 | 2 | |a Education, Special |
| 650 | 0 | |a Children with disabilities. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Special education. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Children with disabilities |x Education |x Law and legislation |z United States. | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 | |
| 651 | 2 | |a United States | |
| 630 | 0 | 7 | |a Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (United States) |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01380476 |
| 655 | 7 | |a Electronic books. |2 local | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Project Muse. |e distributor | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Book collections on Project MUSE. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |z Texto completo |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/26370/ |
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - 2013 Political Science and Policy Studies | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - 2013 Complete | ||