Cargando…

The Science of the Soul : The Commentary Tradition on Aristotle's De anima, c. 1260-c. 1360 /

The transformation of the science of the soul between 1260 and 1360Aristotle''s highly influential work on the soul, entitled De anima, formed part of the core curriculum of medieval universities and was discussed intensively. It covers a range of topics in philosophical psychology, such a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Boer, Sander Wopke de (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Leuven : Leuven University Press, 2013.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_24931
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905042644.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 130424t20132013be o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9789461660787 
020 |z 9789058679307 
035 |a (OCoLC)840613601 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Boer, Sander Wopke de,  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The Science of the Soul :   |b The Commentary Tradition on Aristotle's De anima, c. 1260-c. 1360 /   |c sander W. de Boer. 
264 1 |a Leuven :  |b Leuven University Press,  |c 2013. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2014 
264 4 |c ©2013. 
300 |a 1 online resource (500 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Ancient and Medieval Philosophy - Series 1 ;  |v 46 
500 |a Revision of the author's thesis (ph. D.), Radboud University Nijmegen. 
505 0 0 |g Introduction --  |t Subject matter --  |t Status quaestionis --  |t Periodisation and sources --  |t A chronological list of consulted commentaries --  |t Orthography, punctuation and translations --  |t Overview --  |t The introduction of the De anima into the Latin West --  |t The soul as perfectio --  |t Avicenna's influence --  |t The soul as forma --  |t Immortal but not personal : radical Aristotelianism --  |t Formality and subsistence combined : Thomas Aquinas --  |t A substance, but also a form --  |t Unicity versus plurality of substantial form --  |t Methodological discussions --  |t The scientific Status of the scientia de anima --  |t Imperceptibility --  |t Simplicity --  |t Potentiality --  |t The study of the soul within natural philosophy --  |t Radulphus Brito against John of Jandun --  |t An increasing focus on the intellect --  |t The subject matter of the scientia de anima --  |t The soul as subject matter --  |t The ensouled body sub ratione anirnae as subject matter --  |t Leaving the subject matter undecided --  |t Summary --  |t The epistemic Status of the scientia de anima --  |t Unproblematic beginnings : Thomas Aquinas --  |t Certitude and nobility combined : Anonymus Van Steenberghen and Walter Burley --  |t Increasing difficulties : Anonymus Bazán, Radulphus Brito and John of Jandun --  |t The final stages : John Buridan and Nicole Oresme --  |t Conclusions --  |t The aristotelian definition of the soul --  |t Aristotle's definition of the soul --  |t Thomas Aquinas's views on the matter of the soul --  |t The Anonymi --  |t Fourteenth-century interpretations --  |t The substantiality of the soul --  |t The actuality of the body --  |t Can we perceive the identity of accidents? --  |t Thomas Aquinas --  |t Radulphus Brito --  |t John of Jandun --  |t John Buridan --  |t Excursus : condemnations and polemics --  |t Conclusions --  |t Substance, powers and acts --  |t A curious fourteenth-century thought experiment --  |t One soul or multiple souls? --  |t John Buridan's arguments against a plurality of souls --  |t Nicole Oresme's hesitation --  |t Summary --  |t The relation between the soul and its powers --  |t Arguments against a real distinction --  |t Arguments in favor of a real distinction --  |t Some preliminary conclusions --  |t The identification of the soul with its powers --  |t The soul's presence in the body --  |t From annulose to perfect animals --  |t Is the soul extended or not? --  |t The discussion of the soul's presence after Ockham --  |t Is the power of sight really present in the foot? --  |t From annulose animals to perfect animals --  |t From animal soul to human soul --  |t The intellective soul : material or immaterial? --  |t Epilogue and conclusions --  |t The fragile unity of the science of the soul --  |t Final conclusions --  |g Bibliography --  |g Manuscripts --  |g Published sources --  |g Secondary literature --  |g Index Codicum Manuscriptorum --  |g Index Nominum. 
520 |a The transformation of the science of the soul between 1260 and 1360Aristotle''s highly influential work on the soul, entitled De anima, formed part of the core curriculum of medieval universities and was discussed intensively. It covers a range of topics in philosophical psychology, such as the relationship between mind and body and the nature of abstract thought. However, there is a key difference in scope between the socalled 'science of the soul'', based on Aristotle, and modern philosophical psychology. This book starts from a basic premise accepted by all medieval commentators, namely that. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
600 0 0 |a Aristotle.  |t De anima. 
650 7 |a Soul.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01432098 
650 7 |a Psychology.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01081447 
650 7 |a Philosophy of mind.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01060840 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x History & Surveys  |x Ancient & Classical.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x Reference.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x Essays.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a psychology.  |2 aat 
650 6 |a Âme. 
650 6 |a Philosophie de l'esprit. 
650 6 |a Psychologie. 
650 0 |a Soul. 
650 0 |a Philosophy of mind. 
650 0 |a Psychology. 
630 0 7 |a De anima (Aristotle)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01356409 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/24931/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2012 Philosophy and Religion Supplement II 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2012 Complete Supplement II