Cargando…

Prehension and Hafting Traces on Flint Tools : A Methodology /

"The capacity to mount stone tools in or on a handle is considered an important innovation in past human behaviour. The insight to assemble two different materials (organic and inorganic) into a better functioning entity indicates the presence of the required mental capacity and technological e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rots, Veerle
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Leuven : Leuven University Press, 2010.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_24363
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905042610.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 100722s2010 be o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9789461660060 
020 |z 9789058678010 
035 |a (OCoLC)715171764 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Rots, Veerle. 
245 1 0 |a Prehension and Hafting Traces on Flint Tools :   |b A Methodology /   |c Veerle Rots. 
264 1 |a Leuven :  |b Leuven University Press,  |c 2010. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2014 
264 4 |c ©2010. 
300 |a 1 online resource (298 pages):   |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Research methodology -- Prehension and hafting traces: dreams or reality? -- Prehension traces -- dominant variable: material worked -- Hafting traces -- dominant variables I: use motion and material worked -- Hafting traces -- dominant variables II: hafting material and hafting arrangement -- Hafting traces-secondary variables -- Indirect evidence of hafting -- Blind test -- Discussion -- General conclusions. 
520 |a "The capacity to mount stone tools in or on a handle is considered an important innovation in past human behaviour. The insight to assemble two different materials (organic and inorganic) into a better functioning entity indicates the presence of the required mental capacity and technological expertise. Although the identification of stone tool use based on microscopic analysis was introduced in the 1960s, distinguishing between hand-held and hafted tool use has remained a more difficult issue. This volume introduces a methodology, based on a systematic, in-depth study of prehension and hafting traces on experimental stone artefacts, which allows their recognition in archaeological assemblages"--Provided by publisher. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Archeologie  |x Methodologie.  |2 ram 
650 7 |a Prehistoire  |x Methodologie.  |2 ram 
650 7 |a Outils prehistoriques.  |2 ram 
650 7 |a Tools, Prehistoric.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01152615 
650 7 |a Stone implements.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01133862 
650 7 |a Flintwork.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00927410 
650 7 |a Flintknapping.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00927407 
650 7 |a SOCIAL SCIENCE  |x Archaeology.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Outils de pierre. 
650 6 |a Outils prehistoriques. 
650 6 |a Debitage (Prehistoire) 
650 0 |a Flintwork. 
650 0 |a Stone implements. 
650 0 |a Tools, Prehistoric. 
650 0 |a Flintknapping. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/24363/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Complete Supplement II 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Archaeology and Anthropology Supplement II