Cargando…

Edge-Based Clausal Syntax : A Study of (Mostly) English Object Structure /

In this volume, Paul Postal rejects the notion that an English phrase of the form [V + DP] invariably involves a grammatical relation properly chracterized as a 'direct object'. He argues instead that at least three distinct relations occur in such a structure.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Postal, Paul Martin, 1936-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 2010.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction
  • 1.1. Concept Barrels
  • 1.2. Languages and Grammars
  • 1.3. Linguistic Trees
  • 1.4. Edge-Extended Linguistic Trees
  • 1.5. Beyond Edge-Extended Linguistic Trees: Metagraphs
  • 1.6. Anaphora, Arc Relations, and Arc Types
  • 2. Objects and Arrays
  • 2.1. Objects
  • 2.2. Diverse Types of English Objects
  • 2.3. Types of Single Object Structures
  • 2.4. Array 0
  • 2.5. Array 1
  • 2.6. Array 2
  • 2.7. The Prefix Re-
  • 2.8. What the Distinct Arrays Imply
  • 3. Double Object Structures
  • 3.1. Basics
  • 3.2. Links between Array 2 Single Objects and Ditransitive First Objects
  • 3.3. Prepositional Flagging
  • 3.4. More on 3 Objects and 3-Object-to-2 Advancement
  • 3.5. Links between Array 1 Single Objects and Ditransitive Second Objects.
  • 3.6. The Universal Status of 3 Object and 4 Object Types
  • 3.7. Distinct Relations at Different Levels
  • 3.8. Reconstructing 3 Objects as a Special Kind of PP
  • 3.9. A Problem in Peruvian Spanish
  • 3.10. Certain German Ditransitive 3 Objects
  • 4. Periphrastic and Nonperiphrastic Passives
  • 4.1. Preliminary Remarks
  • 4.2. The Overall Structure of Periphrastic Passive Constituents
  • 4.3. Clause Union Complement Passives
  • 4.4. Clauses That Only Look Like Periphrastic Passives
  • 4.5. More on Peruvian Spanish 3-Object-to-2 Advancement
  • 4.6. Passive Victim Arc Constraints
  • 4.7. Middles as Synthetic Passives
  • 4.8. Remarks on Antipassives
  • 4.9. Appendix: Remarks on Adjectival Clauses
  • 5. Passivization Targets: I
  • 5.1. The Adequacy of Simple 2 Object Restrictions
  • 5.2. Pseudopassives and Pseudomiddles
  • 5.3. The Interaction of Ditransitive Passives with Demotion to 4.
  • 5.4. Appendix: Pseudopassives and Adjectival Conversion
  • 6. Passivization Targets: II
  • 6.1. Periphrastic Passivization and Restricted Phenomena
  • 6.2. Expletive There: Basics
  • 6.3. Expletive There: Further Implications
  • 6.4. Implications: Pseudopassive/Ditransitive Passive Parallels
  • 6.5. Particles and 3 Object-Like Behavior
  • 7. Passivization Targets: III
  • 7.1. Passive Conclusions So Far
  • 7.2. The Most Basic Constraints on English Passivization
  • 7.3. Basic Past Ditransitive Passive Observations
  • 7.4. Enriching the Database: I
  • 7.5. Enriching the Database: II
  • 7.6. Not Enriching the Database
  • 7.7. Failures of Ditransitive 4 Object Passivization
  • 7.8. Two Alternative Viewpoints
  • 8. Visser's Generalization
  • 8.1. A Much-Discussed Passivization Failure
  • 8.2. Other Control Cases
  • 8.3. One Aspect of Visser's Generalization Has Nothing to Do with Control.
  • 8.4. Visser's Generalization and Constraints on 3 Object Passivization
  • 8.5. Visser's Generalization Does Not Fully Reduce to Independent Passive Principles
  • 8.6. Perlmutter's Generalization
  • 8.7. Quace-Based Constraints on Pseudopassivization and Q Constructions
  • 8.8. Some Issues Related to Visser's Generalization
  • 8.9. The Absence of Visser's Generalization Restrictions in Promise Nominalizations
  • 8.10. French Parallels to Visser's Generalization
  • 8.11. An Apparent Problem
  • 9. Clauses with That Clause Complements
  • 9.1. Some Basic That Clause Passive Considerations
  • 9.2. Type II Verbal Clause Structures
  • 9.3. Ditransitive Clauses with That Clause Complements
  • 9.4. A Paradigm
  • 9.5. Brief Remarks on Particles, 3 Objects, and That Clauses
  • 10. Results, If Any.