Cargando…

Too Much Free Speech? /

The author takes up an essential and timely inquiry into the Constitutional limits of the Supreme Court's power to create, interpret, and enforce one of the essential rights of American citizens. Analyzing contemporary Supreme Court decisions from the turn of the twenty-first century, the autho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bezanson, Randall P.
Autor Corporativo: United States. Supreme Court
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Urbana [Illinois] : University of Illinois Press, [2012]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_19422
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905042102.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 120605s2012 ilu o 00 0 eng d
010 |z  2019717328 
020 |a 9780252094224 
020 |z 9780252081231 
020 |z 9780252037115 
035 |a (OCoLC)818734003 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Bezanson, Randall P. 
245 1 0 |a Too Much Free Speech? /   |c Randall P. Bezanson. 
264 1 |a Urbana [Illinois] :  |b University of Illinois Press,  |c [2012] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2013 
264 4 |c ©[2012] 
300 |a 1 online resource (280 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Introduction -- New Speakers. Corporations as Speakers : Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010) ; Government and Its Speech Forum : Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 129 S. Ct. 1125 (2009) -- Forms of Speech. Expressive Conduct Unleashed : Hurlye v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, 515 U.S. 557 (1995) ; Speech out of Thin Air : Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 (2000) -- Voting as Speaking, Expressive Association, and Privacy. The Secret Ballot : Voting as Speech : Doe v. Reed, 130 S. Ct. 2811 (2010) -- Is There Such a Thing as Too Much Free Speech?. 
520 |a The author takes up an essential and timely inquiry into the Constitutional limits of the Supreme Court's power to create, interpret, and enforce one of the essential rights of American citizens. Analyzing contemporary Supreme Court decisions from the turn of the twenty-first century, the author argues that judicial interpretations have fundamentally and drastically expanded the meaning and understanding of "speech." The author focuses on judgments such as the much-discussed Citizens United case, which granted the full measure of constitutional protection to speech by corporations, and the Doe vs. Reed case in Washington state, which recognized the signing of petitions and voting in elections as acts of free speech. In each case study, he questions whether the meaning of speech has been expanded too far and critically assesses the Supreme Court's methodology in reaching and explaining its expansive conclusions. --  |c Provided by publisher. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Freedom of speech.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00934044 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Political Freedom & Security  |x Civil Rights.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES  |x Communication Studies.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Constitutional.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Liberte d'expression  |z États-Unis  |v Jurisprudence. 
650 6 |a Liberte d'expression  |z États-Unis. 
650 0 |a Freedom of speech  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Freedom of speech  |z United States. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Trials, litigation, etc.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01423712 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/19422/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2013 Political Science and Policy Studies 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2013 Complete