Cargando…

When Dissents Matter : Judicial Dialogue through US Supreme Court Opinions /

"Analyzing the influence of previous US Supreme Court dissents on future majority opinions, this book presents the first comprehensive study of the effects of dissenting opinions and illuminates which types of dissents successfully influence legal and policy debates, which ones fail to make a d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corley, Pamela C., 1967- (Autor), Ward, Artemus, 1971- (Autor), Steigerwalt, Amy, 1976- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Charlottesville : University of Virginia Press, 2023.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_113891
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905054717.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 230418s2023 vau o 00 0 eng d
010 |z  2023013097 
020 |a 9780813950181 
020 |z 9780813950167 
035 |a (OCoLC)1391691616 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Corley, Pamela C.,  |d 1967-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a When Dissents Matter :   |b Judicial Dialogue through US Supreme Court Opinions /   |c Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, Artemus Ward. 
264 1 |a Charlottesville :  |b University of Virginia Press,  |c 2023. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2023 
264 4 |c ©2023. 
300 |a 1 online resource (180 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Dissenting behavior on the US Supreme Court -- Endeavoring to accommodate : dissent coalition behavior -- Intra-court dialogue : contemporaneous effect of dissents on majority opinions -- Do we respond or do we ignore? -- Judicial conversations through time : the influence of dissents on future US Supreme Court majority opinions. 
520 |a "Analyzing the influence of previous US Supreme Court dissents on future majority opinions, this book presents the first comprehensive study of the effects of dissenting opinions and illuminates which types of dissents successfully influence legal and policy debates, which ones fail to make a difference, and why. Drawing on the private papers of the justices and original data, including textual analysis of opinions, this book demonstrates that court majorities engage with dissents that pose a particular threat to the strength and position of the majority opinion-specifically, well-crafted and attention-grabbing dissents from larger, ideologically mixed coalitions. These results suggest that majorities can be persuaded by thoughtful and careful dissenting arguments but must defend against strident appeals to external actors, including the other branches of government, the media, and the public"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
650 0 |a Judicial process  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Judicial opinions  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Dissenting opinions  |z United States. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
700 1 |a Ward, Artemus,  |d 1971-  |e author. 
700 1 |a Steigerwalt, Amy,  |d 1976-  |e author. 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/113891/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2023 Complete 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2023 Political Science and Policy Studies