Cargando…

How to Interpret the Constitution /

"The U.S. Supreme Court has eliminated the right to abortion and is revisiting other fundamental questions today-about voting rights, affirmative action, gun laws, and much more. Once-arcane theories of constitutional interpretation are profoundly affecting the lives of all Americans. In this b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sunstein, Cass R. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press, [2023]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_113560
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905054708.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 221230s2023 nju o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780691252056 
020 |z 9780691252049 
020 |z 9780691252032 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Sunstein, Cass R.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a How to Interpret the Constitution /   |c Cass R. Sunstein. 
264 1 |a Princeton, New Jersey :  |b Princeton University Press,  |c [2023] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 0000 
264 4 |c ©[2023] 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a "The U.S. Supreme Court has eliminated the right to abortion and is revisiting other fundamental questions today-about voting rights, affirmative action, gun laws, and much more. Once-arcane theories of constitutional interpretation are profoundly affecting the lives of all Americans. In this brief and urgent book, Harvard Law School professor Cass Sunstein provides a lively introduction to competing approaches to interpreting the Constitution-and argues that the only way to choose one is to ask whether it would change American life for the better or worse. If a method of interpretation would eliminate the right of privacy, allow racial segregation, or obliterate free speech, it would be unacceptable for that reason. But some Supreme Court justices are committed to "originalism," arguing that the meaning of the Constitution is settled by how it was publicly understood when it was ratified. Originalists insist that their approach is dictated by the Constitution. That, Sunstein argues, is a big mistake. The Constitution doesn't contain instructions for its own interpretation. Any approach to constitutional interpretation needs to be defended in terms of its broad effects-what it does to our rights and our institutions. It must respect those rights and institutions-and safeguard the conditions for democracy itself."  |c publisher's website. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |1 https://isni.org/isni/000000012176610X 
650 7 |a Law  |x Interpretation and construction.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00993756 
650 7 |a Constitutional law.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00875797 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / American Government / General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 0 |a Law  |z United States  |x Interpretation and construction. 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |z United States. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/113560/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection