Cargando…

The Fourth Amendment : Original Understandings and Modern Policing /

Police are required to obey the law. While that seems obvious, courts have lost track of that requirement due to misinterpreting the two constitutional provisions governing police conduct: the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Fourth Amendment forbids "unreasonable searches and seizures&quo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mannheimer, Michael J. Z. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Ann Arbor, Michigan : University of Michigan Press, 2023.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_113316
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905054700.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 230419t20232023miu o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780472903719 
020 |z 9780472056330 
020 |z 9780472076338 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Mannheimer, Michael J. Z.,  |e author  |1 https://orcid.org/my-orcid?orcid=0000-0001-9294-4401 
245 1 4 |a The Fourth Amendment :   |b Original Understandings and Modern Policing /   |c Michael J.Z. Mannheimer. 
264 1 |a Ann Arbor, Michigan :  |b University of Michigan Press,  |c 2023. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 0000 
264 4 |c ©2023. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 3 |a Police are required to obey the law. While that seems obvious, courts have lost track of that requirement due to misinterpreting the two constitutional provisions governing police conduct: the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Fourth Amendment forbids "unreasonable searches and seizures" and is the source of most constitutional constraints on policing. Although that provision technically applies only to the federal government, the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in the wake of the Civil War, has been deemed to apply the Fourth Amendment to the States. This book contends that the courts' misinterpretation of these provisions has led them to hold federal and state law enforcement mistakenly to the same constitutional standards. The Fourth Amendment was originally understood as a federalism, or "states' rights," provision that, in effect, required federal agents to adhere to state law when searching or seizing. Thus, applying the same constraint to the States is impossible. Instead, the Fourteenth Amendment was originally understood in part as requiring that state officials (1) adhere to state law, (2) not discriminate, and (3) not be granted excessive discretion by legislators. These principles should guide judicial review of modern policing. Instead, constitutional constraints on policing are too strict and too forgiving at the same time. In this book, Michael J.Z. Mannheimer calls for a reimagination of what modern policing could look like based on the original understandings of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |t Constitution.  |n 14th Amendment. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |t Constitution.  |n 4th Amendment. 
650 7 |a Searches and seizures.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01110379 
650 7 |a Police.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01068398 
650 0 |a Searches and seizures  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Police  |x Law and legislation  |z United States. 
630 0 7 |a Constitution (United States)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01356075 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Michigan Publishing (University of Michigan),  |e publisher. 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/113316/