Cargando…

Reciprocity, Truth, and Gender in Pindar and Aeschylus /

In Reciprocity, Truth, and Gender in Pindar and Aeschylus, author Arum Park explores two notoriously difficult ancient Greek poets and seeks to articulate the complex relationship between them. Although Pindar and Aeschylus were contemporaries, previous scholarship has often treated them as represen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Park, Arum (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Ann Arbor, Michigan : University of Michigan Press, 2023.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_111848
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905054552.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 230317t20232023miu o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780472903863 
020 |z 9780472221189 
020 |z 9780472133420 
035 |a (OCoLC)1373308680 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Park, Arum,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Reciprocity, Truth, and Gender in Pindar and Aeschylus /   |c Arum Park. 
264 1 |a Ann Arbor, Michigan :  |b University of Michigan Press,  |c 2023. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2023 
264 4 |c ©2023. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 3 |a In Reciprocity, Truth, and Gender in Pindar and Aeschylus, author Arum Park explores two notoriously difficult ancient Greek poets and seeks to articulate the complex relationship between them. Although Pindar and Aeschylus were contemporaries, previous scholarship has often treated them as representatives of contrasting worldviews. Park's comparative study offers the alternative perspective of understanding them as complements instead. By examining these poets together through the concepts of reciprocity, truth, and gender, this book establishes a relationship between Pindar and Aeschylus that challenges previous conceptions of their dissimilarity. The book accomplishes three aims: first, it shows that Pindar and Aeschylus frame their poetry using similar principles of reciprocity; second, it demonstrates that each poet depicts truth in a way that is specific to those reciprocity principles; and finally, it illustrates how their depictions of gender are shaped by this intertwining of truth and reciprocity. By demonstrating their complementarity, the book situates Pindar and Aeschylus in the same poetic ecosystem, which has implications for how we understand ancient Greek poetry more broadly: using Pindar and Aeschylus as case studies, the book provides a window into their dynamic and interactive poetic world, a world in which ostensibly dissimilar poets and genres actually have much more in common than we might think. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Greek poetry.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00947503 
650 0 |a Greek poetry  |x History and criticism  |v Case studies 
600 0 7 |a Pindar.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00046487 
600 1 0 |a Pindar  |x Criticism, Textual  |v Case studies 
655 7 |a Criticism, interpretation, etc.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01411635 
655 7 |a Case studies.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01423765 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Michigan Publishing (University of Michigan),  |e publisher. 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/111848/