Cargando…

Varieties of Affect /

In this new and original book, Claire Armon-Jones examines the concept of affect and various philosophical positions which attempt to define and characterize it: the standard view, the neo-cognitivist view, and the objectual thesis. She contends that these views radically distort our understanding o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Armon-Jones, Claire
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Buffalo : University of Toronto Press, 1991.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_108518
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905054301.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 190214s1991 onc o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9781487571887 
020 |z 9781487572204 
035 |a (OCoLC)1088342565 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Armon-Jones, Claire. 
245 1 0 |a Varieties of Affect /   |c Claire Armon-Jones. 
264 1 |a Buffalo :  |b University of Toronto Press,  |c 1991. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2023 
264 4 |c ©1991. 
300 |a 1 online resource (192 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Toronto studies in philosophy ;  |v 2 
500 |a A Revision of the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Oxford, 1990. 
520 |a In this new and original book, Claire Armon-Jones examines the concept of affect and various philosophical positions which attempt to define and characterize it: the standard view, the neo-cognitivist view, and the objectual thesis. She contends that these views radically distort our understanding of affect by disregarding modes of affect which fail to conform to the accounts they each employ. Against the standard and neo-cognitivist views she argues that the notions they use to characterize affect are neither necessary nor sufficient; and against the objectual thesis she further argues that affective states exhibit degrees of independence from the concept of an object. She develops a new theory of the varieties of affect that explains their cognitive nature, their felt aspect, their special logic and the relationship between their objectless and object-directed forms. Armon-Jones concludes by suggesting that her arguments call into question certain assumptions about the rationality and moral status of affect and require a revision of the conception of the good in affect. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Affekt  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Emotions (Philosophy)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00908855 
650 7 |a Affect (Psychology)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00798853 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x Criticism.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x Movements  |x Humanism.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Émotions (Philosophie) 
650 6 |a Affect (Psychologie) 
650 2 |a Affect 
650 0 |a Affect (Psychology) 
650 0 |a Emotions (Philosophy) 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/108518/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection