Cargando…
Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence : A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada /
In jurisprudential writing, single decisions are often held up as representative without any evidence to support their representative claims. In order to address this problem, Daved Muttart has made a systematic study encompassing every judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada between 1950 and 2003.E...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Toronto :
University or Toronto Press,
2007.
|
| Colección: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Contents
- List of Tables and Figures
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Section I. Setting the Stage
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Possible Solutions: Case Study of the Supreme Court of Canada
- 3 Beginning to Close the Empirical Gap
- Section II. Measuring the Court�s Decisions
- 4 Fact, Law, and Policy
- 5 Modes of Legal Reasoning
- 6 Changing the Law
- 7 Other Trends: Bright Lines to Principles
- 8 Judicial Attitudes and Other Interesting Findings
- 9 Charter Cases Are Different
- Section III. Testing Theories
- 10 How Judges Judge: Testing Legal Theory11 Is Legal Reasoning Autonomous?
- 12 Is the Supreme Court of Canada �Too� Activist?
- 13 Conclusion: The Gap Has Been Narrowed
- Notes
- Glossary
- Bibliography
- Index
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- K
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- Q
- R
- S
- T
- U
- V
- W
- Z