|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000004a 4500 |
001 |
musev2_103731 |
003 |
MdBmJHUP |
005 |
20230905053831.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr||||||||nn|n |
008 |
220813s2022 nju o 00 0 eng d |
020 |
|
|
|a 9780691240046
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780691240039
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780691240022
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1337947155
|
040 |
|
|
|a MdBmJHUP
|c MdBmJHUP
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Mares, Isabela,
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Protecting the Ballot :
|b How First-Wave Democracies Ended Electoral Corruption /
|c Isabela Mares.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Princeton :
|b Princeton University Press,
|c [2022]
|
264 |
|
3 |
|a Baltimore, Md. :
|b Project MUSE,
|c 2022
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c ©[2022]
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource.
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Cover -- Contents -- Illustrations -- Abbreviations -- Acknowledgments -- 1. How Did First-Wave Democracies End Electoral Corruption? -- 2. The Democratization of Electoral Practices -- 3. Reforming Campaigns: Reducing the Illicit Use of State Resources -- 4. Limiting Vote-Buying and Treating -- 5. Protecting Voter Autonomy: Ballots, Envelopes, and Isolating Spaces -- 6. Curbing Electoral Fraud -- 7. Conclusion -- Appendix -- References -- Index
|
520 |
|
|
|a How reforms limiting electoral misconduct completed the process of democratizationBetween 1850 and 1918, many first-wave democracies in Europe adopted electoral reforms that reduced the incidence of electoral malfeasance. Drawing on analysis of parliamentary deliberations and roll-call votes in France, Germany, Belgium, and the United Kingdom, Protecting the Ballot explores how these electoral changes came about.Reforms limiting electoral malfeasance came in a variety of forms. Some reforms imposed harsher punishments for bribing or the politicization of state resources during campaigns. Other changes improved electoral secrecy, providing better protection of voters' autonomy. By mandating the presence of candidate representatives supervising electoral operations, reforms also reduced the incidence of electoral fraud. Isabela Mares documents how elite splits facilitated the formation of parliamentary majorities in support of electoral reforms. The political composition of these majorities varied across countries and across issue area, depending on the distribution of political resources and the economic and electoral costs incurred by politicians with opportunities to engage in malfeasance. Unpacking the electoral determinants of the demand for reforms, Mares offers an alternative to theories of democratization that emphasize economic considerations alone.By studying the successful adoption of reforms limiting electoral irregularities in first-wave democratic transitions, Protecting the Ballot sheds light on the opportunities and obstacles for ending electoral wrongdoing in recent democracies.
|
588 |
|
|
|a Description based on print version record.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Suffrage.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01137187
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Elections
|x Corrupt practices.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00904333
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Democracy.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00890077
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political ideologies / Democracy.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Democracy
|z Europe
|x History
|y 20th century.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Democracy
|z Europe
|x History
|y 19th century.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Elections
|x Corrupt practices
|z Europe
|x History.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Suffrage
|z Europe
|x History
|y 20th century.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Suffrage
|z Europe
|x History
|y 19th century.
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a Europe.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01245064
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a History.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01411628
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Electronic books.
|2 local
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Project Muse.
|e distributor
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Texto completo
|u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/103731/
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - Custom Collection
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - 2022 Political Science and Policy Studies
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - 2022 Complete
|