Cargando…

Persuading the Supreme Court : The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making /

"Each year the public, media, and government wait in anticipation for the Supreme Court to announce big decisions. These opinions have shaped legal policy in areas as important as healthcare, marriage, abortion, and immigration. It is not surprising that parties and outside individuals and inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hazelton, Morgan L.W (Autor), Hinkle, Rachael K. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, 2022.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_102870
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905053748.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 220912s2022 ksu o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780700633647 
020 |z 9780700633630 
035 |a (OCoLC)1344187848 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Hazelton, Morgan L.W.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Persuading the Supreme Court :   |b The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making /   |c Morgan L.W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle. 
264 1 |a Lawrence, Kansas :  |b University Press of Kansas,  |c 2022. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2022 
264 4 |c ©2022. 
300 |a 1 online resource (296 pages):   |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Briefs and the people who produce them -- Crafting a brief -- Coordinating and coalescing : investigating information sharing between briefs -- The win/loss column : influencing case outcomes -- Standing out or speaking together : how individual briefs shape opinion content -- Shaping the law together : collectively influencing opinion content -- Conclusions. 
520 |a "Each year the public, media, and government wait in anticipation for the Supreme Court to announce big decisions. These opinions have shaped legal policy in areas as important as healthcare, marriage, abortion, and immigration. It is not surprising that parties and outside individuals and interest groups invest an estimated twenty-five to fifty million dollars a year to produce roughly one thousand briefs every year to communicate information to the justices, seeking to impact these rulings. Despite the importance of the Court and the information it receives, many questions remain unanswered regarding the production of such information and its relationship to the Court's decisions. Persuading the Supreme Court leverages the very written arguments submitted to the Court to shed light on both their construction and impact. Drawing on more than 25,000 party and amicus briefs filed between 1984 and 2015 and the text of the related court opinions, as well as interviews with former Supreme Court clerks and attorneys who have prepared and filed briefs before the Supreme Court, Morgan Hazelton and Rachael Hinkle have shed light on one of the more mysterious and consequential features of Supreme Court decisionmaking"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
650 7 |a Legal briefs.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01715681 
650 7 |a Judicial process.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984705 
650 7 |a LAW / Legal Writing  |2 bisacsh 
650 0 |a Judicial process  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Legal briefs  |z United States. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
700 1 |a Hinkle, Rachael K.,  |e author. 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/102870/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2022 Political Science and Policy Studies 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2022 Complete