Cargando…

Before Bostock : The Accidental LGBTQ Precedent of Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins /

"On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County, in a 6 to 3 decision with a majority opinion authored by conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited employment discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual ori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pierceson, Jason, 1972- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Lawrence : University Press of Kansas, 2022.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_101710
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905053643.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 210804s2022 ksu o 00 0 eng d
010 |z  2021038313 
020 |a 9780700633159 
020 |z 9780700633142 
035 |a (OCoLC)1335751532 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Pierceson, Jason,  |d 1972-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Before Bostock :   |b The Accidental LGBTQ Precedent of Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins /   |c Jason Pierceson. 
264 1 |a Lawrence :  |b University Press of Kansas,  |c 2022. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2022 
264 4 |c ©2022. 
300 |a 1 online resource (216 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a LGBTQ rights, statutory interpretation, and judicial policymaking -- The history of LGBTQ rights, sex, and Title VII -- Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins and the shift in Title VII interpretation -- Transgender rights and Price Waterhouse -- Sexual orientation, Price Waterhouse, and Oncale -- Bostock, Stephens, and Zarda in the lower federal courts -- The Supreme Court's seemingly minimalist but remarkably consequential decision. 
520 |a "On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County, in a 6 to 3 decision with a majority opinion authored by conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited employment discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation. The decision was a surprise to many, if not most, observers, but as Jason Pierceson explores in this work, it was not completely unanticipated. The decision was grounded in a recent, but well-developed, shift in federal jurisprudence on the question of LGBTQ rights that occurred around 2000, with gender identity claims faring better in federal court after decades of skepticism. The most important precedent for these cases was a 1989 Supreme Court case that did not deal directly with LGBTQ rights: Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. The Court ruled in Price Waterhouse that "sex stereotyping" is a form of discrimination under Title VII, a provision that prohibits discrimination in employment based upon sex. Anne Hopkins was a cisgender, heterosexual woman who was denied a promotion at her accounting firm for being too "masculine." At the time of the decision, and in the wake of the devastating decision for the LGBTQ movement in Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), the case was not viewed as creating a strong precedential foundation for LGBTQ rights claims, especially claims based upon sexual orientation. Even in the context of gender identity, the connection was not made to the emerging movement for transgender rights until a decade later. In the 2000s, however, federal courts were consistently applying the case to protect transgender individuals. While not the result of coordinated litigation, nor initially connected to the LGBTQ rights movement, Price Waterhouse has been one of the most important and powerful precedents in recent years, outside of the marriage equality cases. This book tells the story of how this "accidental" precedent evolved into such a crucial case for contemporary LGBTQ rights"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Sexual minorities  |x Legal status, laws, etc.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01983693 
650 7 |a Discrimination in employment  |x Law and legislation.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00895060 
650 0 |a Sexual minorities  |x Legal status, laws, etc.  |z United States  |x Cases. 
650 0 |a Discrimination in employment  |x Law and legislation  |z United States  |x Cases. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Trial and arbitral proceedings.  |2 lcgft 
655 7 |a Trials, litigation, etc.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01423712 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/101710/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2022 Political Science and Policy Studies 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2022 Complete