Cargando…
Social network sites for scientists : a quantitative survey /
Social Network Sites for Scientists: A Quantitative Survey explores the newest social network sites (for example, ResearchGate and Academia.edu) and web bibliographic platforms (Mendeley, Zotero) that have recently emerged for the scholarly community to use in the interchange of information and docu...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge, MA :
Chandos Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier,
[2016]
|
| Colección: | Chandos information professional series.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- 1 Introduction; 1.1 The Web and the Web 2.0 Concept; 1.2 Social Networking Sites
- The Web of the People; 1.3 Open Access
- Toward a New Scientific Communication; 1.4 Almetrics
- The Social Impact of Science; 1.5 Social Network Sites for Scientists; 1.5.1 Definition; 1.5.2 Functions; 1.5.3 Motivations and Adoption; 1.5.4 Typology; 1.5.5 Business Models; 1.6 Methods; 1.6.1 Scope; 1.6.2 Indicators; 1.6.2.1 Activity; 1.6.2.2 Compound Annual Growth Rate.
- 1.6.2.3 Country Penetration1.6.2.4 Country Spreading; 1.6.2.5 Recent Activity; 1.6.3 Sources; 1.6.4 Data Extraction; Note; References; 2 The First Attempts; 2.1 Nature Network; 2.1.1 A Wide Range of Contacting Tools; 2.1.1.1 Forums; 2.1.1.2 Groups; 2.1.1.3 Hubs; 2.1.1.4 Blogs; 2.1.1.5 Questions & Answers; 2.1.1.6 Workbench; 2.1.2 The Natural Community; 2.1.3 The Chatting Room; 2.2 BiomedExperts; 2.2.1 Scientist's Directory; 2.2.2 Interaction Tools; 2.2.3 Structure; 2.2.4 Pre-elaborated Profiles; 2.2.5 UniPHY: The Physics Sequel; 2.2.6 A Static Network of Automatic Profiles.
- 2.3 Why did these Sites Fail?References; 3 Social Bookmarking Sites; 3.1 CiteULike; 3.1.1 A Decayed Database; 3.1.2 Building a Social Library; 3.1.2.1 Tags; 3.1.2.2 Groups; 3.1.3 A Community in Decline; 3.1.4 Research Fields; 3.1.5 The Decay of an Extended Service; 3.2 BibSonomy; 3.2.1 Coverage, a user Called DBLP; 3.2.2 The German Club; 3.2.3 Social Dimension; 3.2.3.1 The BibSonomy's Meeting Point; 3.2.3.2 Tabs, Linking Documents; 3.2.4 A Local Project; 3.3 The Social Benefit of Egoism; Note; References; 4 Reference Management Tools; 4.1 Mendeley; 4.1.1 Desktop App.
- 4.1.2 The Crowdsourced Catalogue4.1.3 The Social Network; 4.1.3.1 Tags or Keywords?; 4.1.3.2 Profiles, the Students' Network; 4.1.3.3 Groups, the Readers' Club; 4.1.4 Discovering Recommended Papers; 4.2 Zotero; 4.2.1 References in the Cloud; 4.2.1.1 Profiles, Just a Calling Card; 4.2.1.2 Groups, the Only Way of Sharing; 4.2.2 Open Source, Close Content; 4.3 Could a Reference Manager be a Social Site?; References; 5 Document Sharing Services; 5.1 ResearchGate; 5.1.1 Metrics, Tracking the User Actions; 5.1.1.1 RG Score; 5.1.1.2 Impact Points; 5.1.1.3 Citations; 5.1.1.4 Publications.
- 5.1.1.5 Views5.1.1.6 Downloads; 5.1.1.7 Followers/followings; 5.1.2 Organizations, Beyond the Personal Profiles; 5.1.3 Publications, Self-archiving Driving Force; 5.1.4 Profiles, a Balanced Scientific Community; 5.1.5 Questions & Answers, a Forum Concealed by Questions; 5.1.6 More than a Social Network; 5.2 Academia.edu; 5.2.1 Profiles, the Humanists Network; 5.2.2 Papers, an Unstructured Ragbag; 5.2.3 Research Interests, Tagging the Content; 5.2.4 Viewers or Producers Network?; 5.3 Towards the Complete Academic Networking Site; References; 6 Comparison; 6.1 Size, Searching the Critical Mass.