|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000007a 4500 |
001 |
OR_on1263003901 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231017213018.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr cnu|||||||| |
008 |
210806s2020 xx o 000 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a AU@
|b eng
|c AU@
|d OCLCQ
|d TOH
|d OCLCQ
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781786300690
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781119693581
|
024 |
8 |
|
|a 9781786300690
|
029 |
0 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000067271925
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1263003901
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 332.04154
|q OCoLC
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Guilhon, Bernard,
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Venture Capital and the Financing of Innovation /
|c Guilhon, Bernard.
|
250 |
|
|
|a 1st edition.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|b Wiley-ISTE,
|c 2020.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (196 pages)
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
347 |
|
|
|a text file
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a Innovation, entrepreneurship and management series. Innovation between risk and reward set ;
|v volume 6
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Machine generated contents note: ch. 1 Venture Capital, Behavior and Performance of Stakeholders -- 1.1. The analytical framework -- 1.1.1. The contractual model and agency problems -- 1.1.2. The resource-dependent approach -- 1.2. From the theoretical framework to the empirical findings: observed behaviors -- 1.2.1. Methodological problems -- 1.2.2. The arbitrations made: the entrepreneurial risk -- 1.2.3. The change of the relationships over time -- 1.2.4. Behaviors of refusal -- 1.2.5. Risk aversion of venture capitalists -- 1.3. The contribution of venture capital to the performance of innovative companies -- 1.3.1. Innovation, growth and employment -- 1.3.2. Survival rates and entrepreneurial persistence -- 1.4. Conclusion -- ch. 2 The Sectoral Dynamics of Venture Capital -- 2.1. Orientation by sector -- 2.1.1. The orientation of venture capital by sector in the United States -- 2.1.2. The trajectory in Europe -- 2.1.3. The lessons learned -- 2.2. High-tech industries, a less stable group
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Note continued: 2.2.1. Knowledge base, high-tech sectors, and venture capital: the macroeconomic influence -- 2.2.2. The influence of advanced industries on the performance of the US economy -- 2.2.3. Business creation, growth thresholds, and the new technology sector -- 2.2.4. Elements of explanation -- 2.3. An econometric model for determining high-tech investment in Europe -- 2.3.1. The approach used: the analytical framework and assumptions made -- 2.3.2. The econometric model -- 2.3.3. Results and discussion -- 2.4. Conclusion -- ch. 3 The Three Structures for Interpreting Venture Capital: The Market, Industry and Institutions -- 3.1. An interpretation of venture capital in market terms -- 3.1.1. From market efficiency to wealth creation -- 3.1.2. Characteristics and functions of the market -- 3.1.3. The venture capital market -- 3.1.4. Why talk about a new market? -- 3.1.5. Risk management at market levels -- 3.2. An interpretation of venture capital in terms of industry
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Note continued: 3.2.1. The spread of an industrial logic -- 3.2.2. The relative weight of venture capital investment in relation to GDP -- 3.3. The role of institutions in the dynamics of the venture capital industry -- 3.3.1. An econometric model for determining venture capital investment -- 3.3.2. Specific analysis of institutional factors -- 3.4. Conclusion.
|
520 |
|
|
|a The funding of innovative projects that are fundamentally ambiguous often leads to situations where decision-making is difficult. However, decision-making can be improved by practices such as syndication and step-by-step funding. The dynamic of this industry requires us to consider the economic and institutional variables that make this system coherent in English-speaking countries, but conversely reduce it to a privileged niche by the leading authorities in Europe and France. This book proposes two guiding ideas. The first idea presents innovation as a very uncertain process. This modifies the decision-making in the entrepreneurial ecosystem, with intervention upstream in regards to stronger foundations, evaluations and selection of projects. The second idea is that the actors hold onto partial knowledge in a context where their attention span is limited. These cognitive limitations need the formation of networks, and lead to mutual and complementary dependency relations.
|
542 |
|
|
|f Copyright © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons
|g 2019
|
550 |
|
|
|a Made available through: Safari, an O'Reilly Media Company.
|
588 |
|
|
|a Online resource; Title from title page (viewed February 5, 2020)
|
590 |
|
|
|a O'Reilly
|b O'Reilly Online Learning: Academic/Public Library Edition
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Montchaud, Sandra,
|e author.
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Safari, an O'Reilly Media Company.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/~/9781786300690/?ar
|z Texto completo (Requiere registro previo con correo institucional)
|
936 |
|
|
|a BATCHLOAD
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|