Cargando…

Limits of constraint : the originalist jurisprudence of Hugo Black, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas /

"Adherents of originalism often present it as a theory that constrains legal decisions in a clear and objective manner, based on the original text of the Constitution and the intentions of the Framers-in contrast to the supposedly subjective and "activist" jurisprudence of those who p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Staab, James Brian (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, 2022.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 JSTOR_on1338021273
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 220802s2022 ksu ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a YDX  |b eng  |c YDX  |d P@U  |d JSTOR  |d N$T  |d K6U  |d BOL  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d SFB  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
020 |a 9780700633319  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0700633316  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780700633302 
020 |z 0700633308 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000073978331 
035 |a (OCoLC)1338021273 
037 |a 22573/ctv2svxx25  |b JSTOR 
050 4 |a KF4550 
082 0 4 |a 342.73  |2 23/eng/20220808 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Staab, James Brian,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Limits of constraint :  |b the originalist jurisprudence of Hugo Black, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas /  |c James B. Staab. 
264 1 |a Lawrence, Kansas :  |b University Press of Kansas,  |c 2022. 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Biographical sketches -- Hugo Black's originalism : Jeffersonian -- Antonin Scalia's originalism : Hamiltonian -- Clarence Thomas's originalism : natural law libertarian -- Black vs. Scalia and Thomas -- Scalia vs. Thomas -- Conclusion. 
520 |a "Adherents of originalism often present it as a theory that constrains legal decisions in a clear and objective manner, based on the original text of the Constitution and the intentions of the Framers-in contrast to the supposedly subjective and "activist" jurisprudence of those who promote a living Constitution. But originalists have not had the same views on constitutional issues, calling into question the theory of originalism. The Limits of Constraint examines the originalist jurisprudence of Hugo Black, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas, showing that the Court's three originalists have arrived at different conclusions in a large number of constitutional areas. While the starkest contrast is between Justice Black and Justices Scalia and Thomas, even the latter two justices have disagreed on a number of key issues, including executive power and the administrative state. James Staab shows that originalism in actual practice does not deliver on its promise of an objective jurisprudence free of bias and so-called judicial activism"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
600 1 0 |a Thomas, Clarence,  |d 1948- 
600 1 0 |a Scalia, Antonin,  |d 1936-2016. 
600 1 0 |a Black, Hugo LaFayette,  |d 1886-1971. 
600 1 7 |a Thomas, Clarence,  |d 1948-  |2 fast 
600 1 7 |a Scalia, Antonin,  |d 1936-2016  |2 fast 
600 1 7 |a Black, Hugo LaFayette,  |d 1886-1971  |2 fast 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |z United States. 
650 7 |a Constitutional law  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast 
653 |a Originalism 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |z 9780700633302  |z 0700633308  |w (DLC) 2021050553  |w (OCoLC)1289918798 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctv2sx9fwk  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH40470072 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n musev2_102012 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 303052505 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 3345764 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP