|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
001 |
JSTOR_on1336986306 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231005004200.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr |n||||||||| |
008 |
220724s2022 ksu ob 001 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a YDX
|b eng
|c YDX
|d P@U
|d JSTOR
|d N$T
|d ASR
|d UKAHL
|d OCLCQ
|d SFB
|d OCL
|d OCLCQ
|d CLU
|d OCLCO
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780700633401
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0700633405
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780700633395
|q (paperback)
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000073978321
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1336986306
|
037 |
|
|
|a 22573/ctv2s4586h
|b JSTOR
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a KF5067
|b .L87 2022eb
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x 109000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x 111000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x 060000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 342.73/062
|2 23/eng/20220801
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Lurie, Jonathan,
|d 1939-
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 /
|c Jonathan Lurie.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Lawrence, Kansas :
|b University Press of Kansas,
|c [2022]
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c ©2022
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource.
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a Landmark law cases and American society
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Part I: The history of a new federal tribunal -- The long road to the Court of Claims -- Approaching the gates of the Court : The Six Tribes and Congress until 1927 -- Still waiting at the gates of the court, 1926-1928 -- Part II: The pocket veto : challengers and challenges -- Reacting to the Pocket Veto, 1927-1928 -- The Supreme Court agrees to read and listen, 1928-1929 -- The Pocket Veto and the Supreme Court, 1929-1938 -- Part III: Beyond the Pocket Veto case -- Digging deeper into the Pocket Veto Cases, 1970-1987.
|
520 |
|
|
|a "According to the US Constitution, if a bill is not returned to Congress by the president after ten days of receiving it and Congress is adjourned, the bill is effectively vetoed. The so-called "pocket veto" dates at least as far back as the presidency of James Madison, but the constitutionality of its use had not been considered by the Supreme Court until Okanogan, Methow, San Poels...Indians v. the United States was decided in 1929, during the last year of Chief Justice Taft's tenure. Despite responding to a situation in American Indian Law, the Pocket Veto Case is notable for the fact its final decision had nothing whatsoever to do with Indian Law. The Okanogan Tribe is barely mentioned at all in the Court's unanimous opinion, delivered by Justice Edward Sanford, which ultimately concluded that the pocket veto is a constitutional exercise of presidential authority"--
|c Provided by publisher.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR All Purchased
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA)
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Pocket veto
|z United States
|x Cases.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Indians of North America
|x Legal status, laws, etc.
|x Cases.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Veto de poche
|z États-Unis
|x Jurisprudence.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Pocket veto
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Indians of North America
|x Legal status, laws, etc.
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a United States
|2 fast
|
653 |
|
|
|a Okanogan, Methow, San Poelis, Nespelem, Colville, and Lake Indian Tribes v. United States, 279 U.S. 655 (1929)
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Trials, litigation, etc.
|2 fast
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Lurie, Jonathan, 1939-
|t Unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929.
|d Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2022]
|z 9780700633395
|w (DLC) 2021050480
|w (OCoLC)1289921512
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Landmark law cases & American society.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctv2s5b4hw
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a Askews and Holts Library Services
|b ASKH
|n AH40445822
|
938 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE
|b MUSE
|n musev2_101892
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 303038183
|
938 |
|
|
|a EBSCOhost
|b EBSC
|n 3339024
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|