Cargando…

The campaign finance cases : Buckley, McConnell, Citizens United, and McCutcheon /

"[This book] tells the legal story of campaign finance reform from the early efforts in Buckley v. Valeo (1976), to the McConnell v. FEC case in 2003 that largely upheld the McCain-Feingold Act, to the landmark Citizens United and McCutcheon decisions. Legal historian Melvin Urofsky shows that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Urofsky, Melvin I. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2020]
Colección:Landmark law cases & American society.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 JSTOR_on1236368417
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 210207t20202020ksu ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a YDX  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c YDX  |d OCLCO  |d JSTOR  |d OCLCO  |d P@U  |d K6U  |d OCLCO  |d OCL  |d CUV  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d N$T  |d OCLCO 
020 |a 9780700629893  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0700629890  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780700629879 
020 |z 0700629874 
020 |z 9780700629886 
020 |z 0700629882 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000068746630 
035 |a (OCoLC)1236368417 
037 |a 22573/ctv1ft15v7  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF4920  |b .U755 2020 
082 0 4 |a 342.73/078  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Urofsky, Melvin I.,  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The campaign finance cases :  |b Buckley, McConnell, Citizens United, and McCutcheon /  |c Melvin I. Urofsky. 
264 1 |a Lawrence, Kansas :  |b University Press of Kansas,  |c [2020] 
264 4 |c Ã2020 
300 |a 1 online resource (xv, 237 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Landmark law cases & American society 
520 |a "[This book] tells the legal story of campaign finance reform from the early efforts in Buckley v. Valeo (1976), to the McConnell v. FEC case in 2003 that largely upheld the McCain-Feingold Act, to the landmark Citizens United and McCutcheon decisions. Legal historian Melvin Urofsky shows that the early effort to distinguish between donated money as opposed to money spent by candidates made little sense. For all the uproar about Citizens United, the decision made good legal sense, but now it is up to Congress to enact campaign finance regulation that meets the Court's criteria"--  |c Provided by the publisher. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Campaign finance reform before 1971 -- Reform and response : the Federal Election Campaign Act and Buckley -- Soft money, PACs, and the failure of campaign finance reform after 1976 -- The road to McCain-Feingold -- The Supreme Court and elections : from Buckley to McConnell -- Interlude : confusion in the District Court -- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission -- From McConnell to Citizens United -- Meet Mr. McCutcheon -- Afterword -- Appendix A. Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 -- Appendix B. 1974 amendments to FECA -- Appendix C. 1976 amendments to FECA -- Appendix D. 1979 amendments to FECS -- Appendix E. Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. 
588 0 |a Print version record 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
650 0 |a Campaign funds  |x Law and legislation  |z United States  |x Cases. 
650 7 |a Campaign funds  |x Law and legislation  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast 
655 7 |a Trials, litigation, etc.  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Urofsky, Melvin I.  |t Campaign finance cases.  |d Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2020]  |z 9780700629879  |w (DLC) 2020006825  |w (OCoLC)1147928078 
830 0 |a Landmark law cases & American society. 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctv1ft83zz  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n muse85400 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 301920212 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 3610702 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP