Cargando…

Practices and principles : approaches to ethical and legal judgment /

In Practices and Principles, Mark Tunick takes up the debate between universalists and relativists, and, in political philosophy, between communitarians and liberals, each of which has roots in an earlier debate between Kant and Hegel.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Tunick, Mark (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, [1998]
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 JSTOR_on1200575936
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 970709s1998 nju ob 001 0 eng d
010 |z  97029599  
040 |a INARC  |b eng  |e rda  |c INARC  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCA  |d JSTOR  |d OCLCO  |d EBLCP  |d CSA  |d OCLCO  |d N$T  |d LUU  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
015 |a GB9918420  |2 bnb 
015 |a GB99-18420 
019 |a 1200552787  |a 1200560730  |a 1200565112  |a 1237405332 
020 |a 9780691227436  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0691227438  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 0691015600  |q (cloth ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |z 9780691015606  |q (cloth ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |z 0691070792 
020 |z 9780691070797 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000068869093 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000070037026 
035 |a (OCoLC)1200575936  |z (OCoLC)1200552787  |z (OCoLC)1200560730  |z (OCoLC)1200565112  |z (OCoLC)1237405332 
037 |a 22573/ctv1dd1vnf  |b JSTOR 
050 0 4 |a K370  |b .T86 1998 
072 7 |a PHI  |x 019000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 340/.112  |2 21 
084 |a 86.04  |2 bcl 
084 |a CC 7600  |2 rvk 
084 |a CC 7200  |2 rvk 
084 |a CF 5017  |2 rvk 
084 |a CG 4077  |2 rvk 
084 |a MB 3300  |2 rvk 
084 |a MC 6451  |2 rvk 
084 |a MC 5451  |2 rvk 
084 |a PI 3580  |2 rvk 
084 |a PI 3500  |2 rvk 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Tunick, Mark,  |e author 
245 1 0 |a Practices and principles :  |b approaches to ethical and legal judgment /  |c Mark Tunick. 
264 1 |a Princeton, N.J. :  |b Princeton University Press,  |c [1998] 
264 4 |c Ã1998 
300 |a 1 online resource (viii, 242 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 223-233) and indexes. 
505 0 |a Introduction. The problem ; Practices and principles ; Building on Kant and Hegel -- Kant versus Hegel. Kant's principle conception ; Hegel's Criticism of Kant's principle conception ; Hegel on the importance of social practice ; Implications ; Kant or Hegel: principles without practice or principles immanent in practice? -- Promises. The problem ; Scanlon's example ; Principle conceptions of promising ; Scanlon's principles M and F ; Conclusion: practices and the obligation to keep promises -- Contracts. Problems in contract law ; Principles ; Practices and principles in contract law -- Privacy. The problem ; Determining the reasonableness of expectations of privacy: practice or principles? ; Incorporating practice and principle in Fourth Amendment reasonable-expectation-of-privacy analysis: the mischance principle applied -- Practices, principles, and contemporary political theory. The role of social practice in ethical and legal judging ; Contemporary political theorists on the role of social practice ; Practices and principles ; Practices, principles, and the liberal-communication debate ; Practices, principles, and the relativism-universalism debate. 
520 |a In Practices and Principles, Mark Tunick takes up the debate between universalists and relativists, and, in political philosophy, between communitarians and liberals, each of which has roots in an earlier debate between Kant and Hegel. 
520 8 |a Tunick focuses on three case studies: promises, contract law, and the Fourth Amendment issue of privacy. In his analysis, he rejects both uncritical deference to social practice and draconian adherence to principles when making legal and ethical judgments. He argues that we do not always need to choose between abstract principles and social practices. Sometimes we appeal to both; sometimes we need to appeal to shared social norms; and sometimes, where there is no ethical community, we can only appeal to principles. Ultimately, he rejects simplified arguments that force us to choose between either practices or principles, universalism or relativism, and liberalism or communitarianism. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Evidence Based Acquisitions 
600 1 0 |a Kant, Immanuel,  |d 1724-1804. 
600 1 0 |a Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich,  |d 1770-1831. 
600 1 4 |a Kant, Immanuel,  |d 1724-1804. 
600 1 4 |a Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich,  |d 1770-1831. 
600 1 6 |a Kant, Immanuel,  |d 1724-1804. 
600 1 6 |a Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich,  |d 1770-1831. 
600 1 7 |a Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich,  |d 1770-1831  |2 fast 
600 1 7 |a Kant, Immanuel,  |d 1724-1804  |2 fast 
600 1 7 |a Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich,  |d (1770-1831)  |2 ram 
650 0 |a Sociological jurisprudence. 
650 0 |a Law and ethics. 
650 6 |a Sociologie juridique. 
650 6 |a Droit et morale. 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY / Political  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Law and ethics  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Sociological jurisprudence  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Rechtsethik  |2 gnd 
650 1 7 |a Moraal.  |2 gtt 
650 1 7 |a Universaliteit.  |2 gtt 
650 1 7 |a Relativisme.  |2 gtt 
650 7 |a Droit et morale.  |2 ram 
650 7 |a Sociologie juridique.  |2 ram 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Tunick, Mark  |t Practices and Principles  |d Princeton : Princeton University Press,c1998  |z 9780691015606 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctv1ddczvg  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Internet Archive  |b INAR  |n practicesprincip19980000tuni_g9y1 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL6475670 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 2725457 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP