Cargando…

Taking back the Constitution : activist judges and the next age of American law /

"The Supreme Court has never simply evaluated laws and arguments in light of permanent and immutable constitutional meanings, and social, moral, and yes, political ideas have always played into Supreme Court justices' impressions of how they think a case should be decided. Mark Tushnet tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Tushnet, Mark, 1945- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: New Haven : Yale University Press, [2020]
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 JSTOR_on1164198427
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 200710t20202020ctu ob 001 0 eng d
010 |a  2019952447 
040 |a JSTOR  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c JSTOR  |d EBLCP  |d YDX  |d RCJ  |d DEGRU  |d TEFOD  |d UKAHL  |d MM9  |d N$T  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d BRX  |d OCLCF  |d ZAD  |d OCLCO  |d FAU  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 1200188182 
020 |a 9780300252903  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0300252900  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 030024598X 
020 |z 9780300245981 
024 7 |a 10.12987/9780300252903  |2 doi 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000067525942 
035 |a (OCoLC)1164198427  |z (OCoLC)1200188182 
037 |a 22573/ctv13cw061  |b JSTOR 
037 |a 73DC0405-DD48-41FD-8765-B80C521339A6  |b OverDrive, Inc.  |n http://www.overdrive.com 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF8742  |b .T87 2020eb 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 018000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 042020  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 040030  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 347.73035  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Tushnet, Mark,  |d 1945-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Taking back the Constitution :  |b activist judges and the next age of American law /  |c Mark Tushnet. 
264 1 |a New Haven :  |b Yale University Press,  |c [2020] 
264 4 |c ©2020 
300 |a 1 online resource (x, 308 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 283-299) and index. 
520 |a "The Supreme Court has never simply evaluated laws and arguments in light of permanent and immutable constitutional meanings, and social, moral, and yes, political ideas have always played into Supreme Court justices' impressions of how they think a case should be decided. Mark Tushnet traces the ways constitutional thought has evolved from the liberalism of the New Deal and Great Society to the Reagan conservatism that has been dominant since the 1980s. Looking at the current crossroads in the constitutional order, Tushnet explores the possibilities of either a Trumpian entrenchment of the most extreme ideas of the Reagan philosophy, or a dramatic and destabilizing move to the left. Wary of either outcome, he offers a passionate and informed argument for replacing judicial supremacy with popular constitutionalism-a move that would restore the other branches of government's role in deciding constitutional questions"--Provided by the publisher. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a Part one: Where we are now -- Calling balls and strikes -- Originalisms -- Playing politics -- "We've done enough" : the constitutional law of race -- The court and conservative movements -- Culture wars, yesterday and today -- Part two: Where a modern Republican Supreme Court might take us -- Strengthening a new constitutional order : partisan entrenchment and fulfilling campaign pledges -- The business agenda -- Deconstructing the administrative state -- Possibilities thwarted and revived -- The weaponized First Amendment -- Part three: Progressive alternatives : the short run -- Winning elections, enacting statutes -- Putting courts on the progressive agenda -- Playing constitutional hardball -- Part four: Progressive alternatives : the long run -- Popular constitutionalism versus judicial supremacy -- Amending the Constitution -- Conclusion: 2020 and after -- Appendix: Strategies of Supreme Court decision-making. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Evidence Based Acquisitions 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |x History. 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Supreme Court  |x Histoire. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |2 fast 
650 0 |a Judicial review  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |z United States. 
650 6 |a Contrôle juridictionnel des lois  |z États-Unis. 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Constitutional.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Constitutional law  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Judicial review  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast 
655 7 |a History  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |t Taking back the Constitution.  |d New Haven ; London : Yale University Press, [2020]  |z 9780300245981  |w (DLC) 2019952447  |w (OCoLC)1121602839 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctv138wr3v  |z Texto completo 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 16546617 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 2513804 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL6253952 
938 |a De Gruyter  |b DEGR  |n 9780300252903 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH37757412 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP