Cargando…

Rationing the Constitution : how judicial capacity shapes Supreme Court decision-making /

The Supreme Court is a tiny institution that can resolve only a fraction of the constitutional issues generated by the American government. This simple yet startling fact is impossible to deny, but few students of the Court have seriously considered its implications. In Rationing the Constitution, A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Coan, Andrew (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2019.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 JSTOR_on1090130569
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 190319t20192019mau ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d N$T  |d EBLCP  |d YDXIT  |d DEGRU  |d JSTOR  |d OCL  |d BRX  |d RCJ  |d OCLCQ  |d UKAHL  |d MM9  |d UX1  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 1175641998 
020 |a 9780674239180  |q (electronic book) 
020 |a 0674239180  |q (electronic book) 
020 |z 9780674986954 
020 |z 0674986954 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000065219242 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000065899424 
029 1 |a CHNEW  |b 001053040 
029 1 |a CHVBK  |b 567697223 
035 |a (OCoLC)1090130569  |z (OCoLC)1175641998 
037 |a 22573/ctvds72c6  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF4550  |b .C557 2019 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 012000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 062000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 040030  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 018000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 111000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 022000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 347.73/26504  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Coan, Andrew,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Rationing the Constitution :  |b how judicial capacity shapes Supreme Court decision-making /  |c Andrew Coan. 
264 1 |a Cambridge, Massachusetts :  |b Harvard University Press,  |c 2019. 
264 4 |c ©2019 
300 |a 1 online resource (viii, 265 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The Supreme Court is a tiny institution that can resolve only a fraction of the constitutional issues generated by the American government. This simple yet startling fact is impossible to deny, but few students of the Court have seriously considered its implications. In Rationing the Constitution, Andrew Coan explains how the Court's limited capacity shapes U.S. constitutional law and argues that the limits of judicial capacity powerfully constrain Supreme Court decision-making on many of the most important constitutional questions, spanning federalism, separation of powers, and individual rights. Examples include the commerce power, presidential powers, Equal Protection, and regulatory takings. The implications for U.S. constitutional law are profound. Lawyers, academics, and social activists pursuing social reform through the courts must consider whether their goals can be accomplished within the constraints of judicial capacity.--  |c Provided by publisher. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Understanding judicial capacity : Structural and normative underpinnings -- The judicial capacity model -- Refining the model -- Testing the model -- The judicial capacity model applied : federalism -- The commerce power -- The spending power -- Separation of powers -- The nondelegation doctrine -- Presidential administration -- Individual rights -- Equal protection -- Takings -- Positive and normative implications : judicial capacity and the constitutional choice set -- Judicial capacity and judicial competence -- Judicial capacity and judicial independence. 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on April 23, 2019). 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Judges  |x Workload  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Judicial process  |z United States. 
650 6 |a Processus judiciaire  |z États-Unis. 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Civil Procedure.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Legal Services.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x Judicial Branch.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Constitutional.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Constitutional law.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00875797 
650 7 |a Judges  |x Workload.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984562 
650 7 |a Judicial process.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984705 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Coan, Andrew.  |t Rationing the Constitution.  |d Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2019  |z 9780674986954  |w (DLC) 2018042062  |w (OCoLC)1057244786 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctvdmwzm6  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH37032230 
938 |a De Gruyter  |b DEGR  |n 9780674239180 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL5733007 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 2034425 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP