Cargando…

Mythodologies: Methods in Medieval Studies, Chaucer, and Book History

Mythodologies challenges the implied methodology in contemporary studies in the humanities. We claim, at times, that we gather facts or what we will call evidence, and from that form hypotheses and conclusions. Of course, we recognize that the sum total of evidence for any argument is beyond compreh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Joseph A. Dane
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Punctum Books.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000M 4500
001 JSTOR_on1076791151
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr unu||||||||
008 180907nuuuuuuuuxx o 000 0 eng d
040 |a LVT  |b eng  |e pn  |c LVT  |d OCLCQ  |d OAPEN  |d C6I  |d P@U  |d UAB  |d OCLCQ  |d SFB  |d OCLCQ  |d YWS  |d OCLCQ  |d JSTOR  |d OCLCF 
020 |a 9781947447578 
020 |a 1947447572 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000065261174 
035 |a (OCoLC)1076791151 
037 |a 22573/cats2330813  |b JSTOR 
050 4 |a PN671 
072 7 |a LIT  |x 011000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 001.30721  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Joseph A. Dane. 
245 1 0 |a Mythodologies: Methods in Medieval Studies, Chaucer, and Book History 
260 |b Punctum Books. 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Mythodologies challenges the implied methodology in contemporary studies in the humanities. We claim, at times, that we gather facts or what we will call evidence, and from that form hypotheses and conclusions. Of course, we recognize that the sum total of evidence for any argument is beyond comprehension; therefore, we construct, and we claim, preliminary hypotheses, perhaps to organize the chaos of evidence, or perhaps simply to find it; we might then see (we claim) whether that evidence challenges our tentative hypotheses. Ideally, we could work this way. Yet the history of scholarship and our own practices suggest we do nothing of the kind. Rather, we work the way we teach our composition students to write: choose or construct a thesis, then invent the evidence to support it. This book has three parts, examining such methods and pseudo-methods of invention in medieval studies, bibliography, and editing. Part One, "Noster Chaucer," looks at examples in Chaucer studies, such as the notion that Chaucer wrote iambic pentameter, and the definition of a canon in Chaucer. "Our" Chaucer has, it seems, little to do with Chaucer himself, and in constructing this entity, Chaucerians are engaged largely in self-validation of their own tradition. Part Two, "Bibliography and Book History," consists of three studies in the field of bibliography: the recent rise in studies of annotations; the implications of presumably neutral terminology in editing, a case-study in cataloguing. Part Three, "Cacophonies: A Bibliographical Rondo," is a series of brief studies extending these critiques to other areas in the humanities. It seems not to matter what we talk about: meter, book history, the sex life of bonobos. In all of these discussions, we see the persistence of error, the intractability of uncritical assumptions, and the dominance of authority over evidence. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Open Access 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
600 1 0 |a Chaucer, Geoffrey,  |d -1400  |x Criticism and interpretation. 
600 1 7 |a Chaucer, Geoffrey,  |d -1400.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01812213 
650 0 |a Literature, Medieval  |x History and criticism. 
650 7 |a Literary studies: classical, early & medieval.  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Literature, Medieval.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01000151 
655 4 |a Electronic books. 
655 7 |a Criticism, interpretation, etc.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01411635 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/jj.2353954  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n muse77040 
938 |a OAPEN Foundation  |b OPEN  |n 1004668 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP