Cargando…
Australia's human rights scrutiny regime : democratic masterstroke or mere window dressing? /
In 2010 the Australian Government decided that it would not propose a Human Rights Act, despite the relevant recommendation of the 2008-09 National Human Rights Consultation. Instead, it introduced a Human Rights Framework comprising several measures to enhance human rights protection, including the...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Carlton, Victoria :
Melbourne University Press,
2018.
|
| Colección: | MUP academic monograph series.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | JSTOR_on1052767134 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20231005004200.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu|||unuuu | ||
| 008 | 180918s2018 vra ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a TEFOD |b eng |e rda |e pn |c TEFOD |d TEFOD |d OCLCF |d EBLCP |d AUNED |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d JSTOR |d OCLCO | ||
| 019 | |a 1243153654 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780522874129 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 0522874126 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@ |b 000065353208 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a AUNED |b 000065390405 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1052767134 |z (OCoLC)1243153654 | ||
| 037 | |a EE9086D8-05E0-4F61-92F3-28FA70B3A249 |b OverDrive, Inc. |n http://www.overdrive.com | ||
| 037 | |a 22573/cats5360846 |b JSTOR | ||
| 043 | |a u-at--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a JC599.A8 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 055000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 070000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 323.0994 |2 23 |
| 049 | |a UAMI | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fletcher, Adam, |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Australia's human rights scrutiny regime : |b democratic masterstroke or mere window dressing? / |c Adam Fletcher. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Carlton, Victoria : |b Melbourne University Press, |c 2018. | |
| 264 | 4 | |c Ã2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | |a text file | ||
| 347 | |b EPUB | ||
| 347 | |c 19.1MB | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a MUP academic | |
| 520 | |a In 2010 the Australian Government decided that it would not propose a Human Rights Act, despite the relevant recommendation of the 2008-09 National Human Rights Consultation. Instead, it introduced a Human Rights Framework comprising several measures to enhance human rights protection, including theHuman Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. The scrutiny regime under that Act was designed to ensure rights would be given due consideration before Commonwealth legislation was passed. The Act created a unique 'bipartite dialogue' system, involving a formal interchange on rights compatibility between the executive and Parliament, while excluding the courts. This set the Commonwealth apart from jurisdictions such as the ACT, Victoria, New Zealand and the UK, which have statutory rights instruments administered by their courts. The book presents a detailed study of all aspects of the scrutiny regime, and compares the regime with its closest counterparts overseas. In assessing the regime's impact, it argues that a system in which the executive and Parliament are responsible both for protecting rights and for remedying rights breaches is neither more legitimate nor more effective than one involving all three branches of government. Accordingly, it calls for strengthening reforms. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Intro; Title; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; Preface; Introduction; 1. Rights protection in Australia: overview and history; 2. Australia's Human Rights Framework: a unique rights protection system; 3. Statements of Compatibility with human rights; 4. Joint Committee on Human Rights: the first four years; 5. The impact of the human rights scrutiny regime; Conclusion; Appendix 1: Commonwealth Statements of Compatibility with Human Rights 2012-2015; Appendix 2: Ministerial Reponses to Joint Committee on Human Rights Queries 2012-2015; Bibliography; Index | |
| 506 | 0 | |a National edeposit: Available online with temporary download restriction until 24 June 2020 |f Unrestricted online access. |2 star |5 AU-CaNED | |
| 590 | |a JSTOR |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased | ||
| 590 | |a JSTOR |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Human rights |z Australia. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Droits de l'homme (Droit international) |z Australie. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / World / Australian & Oceanian |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Human rights |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Australia |2 fast | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Fletcher, Adam. |t Australia's human rights scrutiny regime. |d Carlton, Victoria : Melbourne University Press, 2018 |z 9780522874112 |w (OCoLC)1061144083 |
| 830 | 0 | |a MUP academic monograph series. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/jj.5371947 |z Texto completo |
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL5676193 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 2231801 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b IZTAP | ||