|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000Mi 4500 |
001 |
JSTOR_on1045748702 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231005004200.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr |n|---||||| |
008 |
151126s2013 gw o 000 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a AU@
|b eng
|e pn
|c AU@
|d OCLCQ
|d JSTOR
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCF
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9783428479825
|
020 |
|
|
|a 3428479823
|
029 |
0 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000062488408
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1045748702
|
037 |
|
|
|a 22573/ctv1q52p1p
|b JSTOR
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a K920 ǂb U545 1999eb
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x 016000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x 060000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 347.07/7
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Schrage, E. J. H.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Unjust Enrichment. :
|b the Comparative Legal History of the Law of Restitution.
|
250 |
|
|
|a 2nd ed.
|
260 |
|
|
|a Berlin :
|b Duncker & Humblot,
|c 2013.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (335 pages).
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History - Band 15 ;
|v v. 15
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Inhaltsverzeichnis; Eltjo Schrage and Barry Nicholas: Unjust Enrichment and the Law of Restitution: A Comparison; J.H. Baker: The Use of Assumpsit for Restitutionary Money Claims 1600 -- 1800; Fictions in Assumpsit; Quantum Meruit; Money laid out (or Money paid); Goods sold; Money had and received; The Absence of Theory; Jan Hallebeek: Developments in Mediaeval Roman Law; I. Introduction; 1. Enrichment and restitution; 2. The prohibition of unjust enrichment as a rule of law; 3. The actual purport of the general prohibition of unjust enrichment.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 4. The general prohibition of unjust enrichment is an argument in legal reasoning5. The general prohibition of unjust enrichment is a reason to grant remedies; 6. Divergent opinions; II. Cases of unjust enrichment; III. Enrichment caused by prohibited interference (C. 2.18.24); 1. The teachings of Martinus; 2. The rejecting of Martinus' teachings; 3. More exceptions to the provision of C. 2.18.24; 4. Ultramontane jurists; 5. Postglossators; IV. Building on another's property; 1. Means of protection; 2. Special cases: repairing and rebuilding; the land is claimed by hereditatis petitio.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 3. Building as management of another's affairs4. The view of Martinus: the builder has an action against the landowner; 5. A middle course; 6. Rejection of Martinus' doctrine; the presumption of gift; 7. The majority position; 8. The Gloss; 9. Ultramontane jurists; 10. Postglossators; V. Transactions made by those without authority to alienate; 1. The teachings of Martinus; 2. The rejection of Martinus' teachings by Bulgarus; 3. The majority position; 4. The Gloss; 5. Ultramontane jurists; 6. Postglossators; VI. The general prohibition as the ultimate foundation of remedies.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 1. Liability of the third party in spite of the fact that the intermediary was a free person (C. 4.26.7.3)2. An actio negotiorum gestorum in spite of the lack of intention to act for the principals benefit (D. 3.5.5.5); 3. A condiction in spite of the lack of negotium (D. 12.1.32); VII. The general rule of law; 1. A rule of the Law of Nations; 2. Where the maxim has no effect; 3. The ultramontane jurists; 4. Postglossators; VIII. Conclusions; David Ibbetson: Unjust Enrichment in England before 1600; The Framework of Unjust Enrichment; Qualified Transactions; Proprietary Claims.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a A) The Action of Accountb) Vitiated Transfers; c) Emblements; Contractual Ideas; a) Contracts by Those with Limited Capacity; b) Contribution; c) Indemnity; d) Other Situations; Status-based Conception; Conclusion; Gareth Jones: The Role of Equity in the English Law of Restitution; I. Common Law and Equity; 1. The Common Law; 2. Equity; II. The Role of the Historian of Equity; III. Equitable Remedies and the Law of Restitution; 1. The Constructive Trust and the Equitable Lien; a) Introduction; b) The Case Law; 2. Tracing Trust Property; 3. The Right to Contribution; 4. Subrogation; 5. Account.
|
500 |
|
|
|a Peters Birks: Restitution for Wrongs.
|
520 |
|
|
|a Hauptbeschreibung "" ... to be consulted before any significant legal debate."" W.J. Stewart in: Scots Law Times 1995This volume is concerned with the history of the concept of, or of the remedies for, unjust enrichment in the Civil law and the Common law. But this history is radically different in the two systems - different both in the starting point of each system and in the methods by which progress from that starting point was made. What for the Civil law is the starting point is for the Common law the ultimate outcome. The Civil law from its earliest medieval beginnings had before.
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR All Purchased
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA)
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Unjust enrichment
|x History.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Restitution
|x History.
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Restitution
|x History.
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Unjust enrichment
|x History.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Enrichissement injustifié
|x Histoire.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Restitution (Droit)
|x Histoire.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a LAW / Comparative
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Restitution.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01095975
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Unjust enrichment.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01161963
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a History.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01411628
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Schrage, Eltjo J.H.
|t Unjust Enrichment. : The Comparative Legal History of the Law of Restitution.
|d Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, ©2013
|z 9783428079827
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History - Band 15.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctv1q6b84f
|z Texto completo
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|