Cargando…
Ius quaesitum tertio.
Hauptbeschreibung This volume is the third one in a series of publications composed by (more or less) the same academic working group. It follows the publications ""Unjust Enrichment: The Comparative Legal History of the Law of Restitution"" (1995, 2nd edition 1999 <978-3-428-...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Berlin :
Duncker & Humblot,
2010.
|
| Colección: | Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History - Band 26.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Table of Contents; DAVID J. IBBETSON and ELTJO J.H. SCHRAGE: Ius quaesitum tertio. A Comparative and Historical Introduction to the Concept of Third Party Contracts; Roman Law; Refusal of a Right of Action to Third Parties; Refusal of a Right of Action to the Stipulator; The Foundations of Mediaval Law; The Medieval Ius Commune; Iura Propria in the Middle Ages; The Early Modern Synthesis of Theory and Practice; Post-Grotius; England; The Modern Law; Common Themes; Generality and Specificity; Third-Party Rights and Other Legal Rules; Practice and Theory.
- SIR JOHN BAKER: Privity of Contract in the Common Law before 1680Formal contracts under seal; Accountability; Assumpsit; Appendix: Some cases summarised from the plea rolls; JAN HALLEBEEK: Ius Quaesitum Tertio in Medieval Roman Law; I. Introduction; II. Justinianic law; 1. The maxims of Roman law; a) alteri stipulari nemo potest; b) per extraneam personam nihil adquiri posse; c) neque stipulari neque emere vendere contrahere, ut alter suo nomine recte agat, possumus; 2. Exceptions to the basic rules; a) The promisee has an interest; the promisee has an action; b) Addition of a penalty clause.
- The promisee has an actionc) Specific exceptional cases where the third party has an action; III. The glossators; 1. The scholarly approach in general; 2. Listing the exceptions; 3. The doctrine of Martinus; 4. The mainstream glossators and the Accursian Gloss: Martinus' doctrine rejected; 5. A general rule for the pact to restore the dowry to a third party; 6. The stipulatio mihi recipienti suo nomine; 7. The servus publicus in medieval context; 8. Conclusions; IV. The commentators; 1. General approach and cocial context.
- 2. Extending the number of cases where the third party beneficiary has an actiona) The son under paternal control and the curator in medieval context; b) The servus publicus in medieval context; c) The donatio sub modo; d) The pactum appositum in rei traditione; 3. Extending the number of cases where the stipulatio alteri has effect for the parties themselves; a) Bartolus: the third party as procurator ad recipiendum and the interesse superveniens; b) The formula mihi recipienti suo nomine; c) A natural obligation confirmed by oath; V. Conclusions.
- HARRY DONDORP: Ius Quaesitum Tertio in Medieval Canon LawI. Introduction; II. Agency acknowledged?; III. Agency rejected; IV. Contracts in favour of a third party acknowledged?; V. Three different interpretations of Laurentius's gloss; VI. New law with regard to third party rights; VII. Contracts in favour of a third rejected; VIII. An Alternative: a promise under oath; IX. An alternative remedy: denuntiatio; X. Contracts in favour of a third party acknowledged?; XI. Promises directed to an absent promisee; XII. Conclusions; Epilogue.