Cargando…

Ius quaesitum tertio.

Hauptbeschreibung This volume is the third one in a series of publications composed by (more or less) the same academic working group. It follows the publications ""Unjust Enrichment: The Comparative Legal History of the Law of Restitution"" (1995, 2nd edition 1999 <978-3-428-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Schrage, E. J. H.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2010.
Colección:Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History - Band 26.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mu 4500
001 JSTOR_on1043547351
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|---|||||
008 151126s2010 gw o 000 0 eng d
040 |a AU@  |b eng  |e pn  |c AU@  |d OCLCQ  |d JSTOR  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
020 |a 9783428527205 
020 |a 3428527208 
029 0 |a AU@  |b 000062434398 
035 |a (OCoLC)1043547351 
037 |a 22573/ctv1q4xd87  |b JSTOR 
050 4 |a KJC1720 ǂb I79 2008eb 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 016000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 060000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 346.4102 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Schrage, E. J. H. 
245 1 0 |a Ius quaesitum tertio. 
260 |a Berlin :  |b Duncker & Humblot,  |c 2010. 
300 |a 1 online resource (440 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History - Band 26 ;  |v v. 26 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a Table of Contents; DAVID J. IBBETSON and ELTJO J.H. SCHRAGE: Ius quaesitum tertio. A Comparative and Historical Introduction to the Concept of Third Party Contracts; Roman Law; Refusal of a Right of Action to Third Parties; Refusal of a Right of Action to the Stipulator; The Foundations of Mediaval Law; The Medieval Ius Commune; Iura Propria in the Middle Ages; The Early Modern Synthesis of Theory and Practice; Post-Grotius; England; The Modern Law; Common Themes; Generality and Specificity; Third-Party Rights and Other Legal Rules; Practice and Theory. 
505 8 |a SIR JOHN BAKER: Privity of Contract in the Common Law before 1680Formal contracts under seal; Accountability; Assumpsit; Appendix: Some cases summarised from the plea rolls; JAN HALLEBEEK: Ius Quaesitum Tertio in Medieval Roman Law; I. Introduction; II. Justinianic law; 1. The maxims of Roman law; a) alteri stipulari nemo potest; b) per extraneam personam nihil adquiri posse; c) neque stipulari neque emere vendere contrahere, ut alter suo nomine recte agat, possumus; 2. Exceptions to the basic rules; a) The promisee has an interest; the promisee has an action; b) Addition of a penalty clause. 
505 8 |a The promisee has an actionc) Specific exceptional cases where the third party has an action; III. The glossators; 1. The scholarly approach in general; 2. Listing the exceptions; 3. The doctrine of Martinus; 4. The mainstream glossators and the Accursian Gloss: Martinus' doctrine rejected; 5. A general rule for the pact to restore the dowry to a third party; 6. The stipulatio mihi recipienti suo nomine; 7. The servus publicus in medieval context; 8. Conclusions; IV. The commentators; 1. General approach and cocial context. 
505 8 |a 2. Extending the number of cases where the third party beneficiary has an actiona) The son under paternal control and the curator in medieval context; b) The servus publicus in medieval context; c) The donatio sub modo; d) The pactum appositum in rei traditione; 3. Extending the number of cases where the stipulatio alteri has effect for the parties themselves; a) Bartolus: the third party as procurator ad recipiendum and the interesse superveniens; b) The formula mihi recipienti suo nomine; c) A natural obligation confirmed by oath; V. Conclusions. 
505 8 |a HARRY DONDORP: Ius Quaesitum Tertio in Medieval Canon LawI. Introduction; II. Agency acknowledged?; III. Agency rejected; IV. Contracts in favour of a third party acknowledged?; V. Three different interpretations of Laurentius's gloss; VI. New law with regard to third party rights; VII. Contracts in favour of a third rejected; VIII. An Alternative: a promise under oath; IX. An alternative remedy: denuntiatio; X. Contracts in favour of a third party acknowledged?; XI. Promises directed to an absent promisee; XII. Conclusions; Epilogue. 
500 |a NEIL G. JONES: Aspects of Privity in England: Equity to 1680. 
520 |a Hauptbeschreibung This volume is the third one in a series of publications composed by (more or less) the same academic working group. It follows the publications ""Unjust Enrichment: The Comparative Legal History of the Law of Restitution"" (1995, 2nd edition 1999 <978-3-428-07982-7>) and ""Negligence: The Comparative Legal History of the Law of Torts"" (2001 <978-3-428-10516-8). The authors of this volume focus on contracts in favour of third parties. They examine two distinct, but closely related topics: The unfolding and gradual withering away of the Roman law maxim Alteri stipular. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
650 0 |a Third parties (Law)  |x History. 
650 0 |a Contracts  |x History. 
650 4 |a Contracts  |z Europe  |x History. 
650 4 |a Law, Medieval. 
650 4 |a Roman law. 
650 6 |a Tiers (Droit)  |x Histoire. 
650 6 |a Contrats  |x Histoire. 
650 7 |a LAW / Comparative  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Contracts  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Third parties (Law)  |2 fast 
655 7 |a History  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Schrage, Eltjo J.H.  |t Ius quaesitum tertio.  |d Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, ©2010  |z 9783428127207 
830 0 |a Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History - Band 26. 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctv1q69wpz  |z Texto completo 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP