|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
001 |
JSTOR_on1042078328 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231005004200.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr ||||||||||| |
008 |
180619t20182018miu ob 001 0 eng |
010 |
|
|
|a 2018029393
|
040 |
|
|
|a DLC
|b eng
|e rda
|e pn
|c DLC
|d OCLCO
|d P@U
|d EBLCP
|d N$T
|d JSTOR
|d YDX
|d LGG
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCF
|d UAB
|d NRC
|d OCLCQ
|d TKN
|d OCLCQ
|d AU@
|d OCL
|d OCLCQ
|d UNOMP
|d AUD
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
019 |
|
|
|a 1148882682
|a 1150167926
|a 1164779514
|a 1266909335
|a 1366143974
|a 1378241367
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780472123995
|q (electronic book)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0472123998
|q (electronic book)
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780472130887
|q (hardcover
|q alkaline paper)
|
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.3998/mpub.9826974
|2 doi
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1042078328
|z (OCoLC)1148882682
|z (OCoLC)1150167926
|z (OCoLC)1164779514
|z (OCoLC)1266909335
|z (OCoLC)1366143974
|z (OCoLC)1378241367
|
042 |
|
|
|a pcc
|
043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
050 |
1 |
4 |
|a JK2265
|b .W53 2018
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a POL
|x 008000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a POL
|x 016000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
0 |
|a 324.273
|2 23
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Wickham-Jones, Mark,
|d 1962-
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Whatever happened to party government? :
|b controversies in American political science /
|c Mark Wickham-Jones.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Ann Arbor :
|b University of Michigan Press,
|c 2018.
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c ©2018
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (xxiii, 403 pages)
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index.
|
520 |
|
|
|a "In 1950, the Committee on Political Parties of the American Political Science Association (APSA) published its much-anticipated report, Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. Highly critical of the existing state of affairs, the report became extremely controversial: before publication, scholars attacked the committee's draft and suggested it should be suppressed. When released it received a barrage of criticisms. Most academics concluded it was an ill-conceived and mistaken initiative. Mark Wickham-Jones provides the first full, archival-based assessment of the arguments within APSA about political parties and the 1950 report. He details the report's failure to generate wider discussion between media, politicians, and the White House. He examines whether it was dominated by a dogmatic attachment to "party government," and charts the relationship between behavioralists and institutionalists. He also discusses the political dimension to research during the McCarthyite years, and reflects on the nature of American political science in the years after 1945, the period in which behavioralism (which privileges the influence of individuals over institutions) became dominant. Detailing APSA's most direct and significant intervention in the political process, Wickham-Jones makes an important contribution to debates that remain in the forefront of discussions about American politics"--
|c Provided by publisher.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Drafting a report, 1946-1950 -- Arguments within APSA -- The public reception -- The academic debate -- The responsible party government model -- Toward a more responsible two-party system and British politics -- American political science and the United Kingdom after 1945 -- V.O. and Schatt -- What happened to the committee on political parties? -- Partisan argument and McCarthyism.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on July 11, 2018).
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR All Purchased
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR Evidence Based Acquisitions
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA)
|
610 |
2 |
0 |
|a American Political Science Association.
|b Committee on Political Parties.
|t Toward a more responsible two-party system.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Political parties
|z United States
|x History.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Two-party systems
|z United States
|x History.
|
651 |
|
0 |
|a United States
|x Politics and government
|y 1945-1953.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Bipartisme
|z États-Unis
|x Histoire.
|
651 |
|
6 |
|a États-Unis
|x Politique et gouvernement
|y 1945-1953.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE
|x Political Process
|x Elections.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE
|x Political Process
|x General.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Political parties
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Politics and government
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Two-party systems
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a United States
|2 fast
|
648 |
|
7 |
|a 1945-1953
|2 fast
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a History
|2 fast
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Wickham-Jones, Mark, 1962-
|t Whatever happened to party government?
|d Ann Arbor, MI : University of Michigan Press, [2018]
|z 9780472130887
|w (DLC) 2018018790
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.3998/mpub.9826974
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a University of Michigan press
|b UOMP
|n 10.3998/mpub.9826974
|
938 |
|
|
|a ProQuest Ebook Central
|b EBLB
|n EBL5439778
|
938 |
|
|
|a EBSCOhost
|b EBSC
|n 1843206
|
938 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE
|b MUSE
|n muse69120
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|