Cargando…
Der Abschreckungseffekt auf die Grundrechtsausübung : Strukturen eines verfassungsrechtlichen Arguments /
Julian Staben examines chilling effects, framed as deterrence-based lines of argument, in the jurisprudence of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) and compares them with the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court. Chilling effects follow distinct patterns when it comes...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Alemán |
| Publicado: |
Tübingen :
Mohr Siebeck,
2017.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | JSTOR_on1030820563 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20231005004200.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr un||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 180404e20171212gw ot 000 u ger d | ||
| 040 | |a OAPEN |b eng |e pn |c OAPEN |d JSTOR |d OCLCF |d ICN |d VT2 |d LOA |d MERER |d ERL |d U3W |d LVT |d UKKNU |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d UAB |d UPM |d SFB |d OCLCQ |d HTM |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO | ||
| 019 | |a 1072024895 |a 1147293915 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783161548383 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 3161548388 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9783161554889 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 3161554884 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1628/9783161554889 |2 doi | |
| 029 | 1 | |a CHVBK |b 556239008 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a CHNEW |b 001035438 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@ |b 000069155726 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1030820563 |z (OCoLC)1072024895 |z (OCoLC)1147293915 | ||
| 037 | |a 22573/ctt2254gd6 |b JSTOR | ||
| 037 | |a 101762 |b Knowledge Unlatched | ||
| 043 | |a e-gx--- |a n-us--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K3240 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 341.4/8 |2 23 |
| 049 | |a UAMI | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Staben, Julian. |4 aut | |
| 242 | 0 | 4 | |a The deterrent effect on the exercise of fundamental rights: structures of a constitutional argument/ Julian Staben |y eng |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a Der Abschreckungseffekt auf die Grundrechtsausübung : |b Strukturen eines verfassungsrechtlichen Arguments / |c Julian Staben. |
| 260 | |a Tübingen : |b Mohr Siebeck, |c 2017. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xii, 208 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Julian Staben examines chilling effects, framed as deterrence-based lines of argument, in the jurisprudence of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) and compares them with the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court. Chilling effects follow distinct patterns when it comes to online behaviour and emerging digital practices and therefore call for their constitutional reassessment. Julian Staben's work enables a more methodologically reflective use of these arguments in the judicial discourse. | ||
| 536 | |a Knowledge Unlatched |c 101762 | ||
| 542 | 1 | |f This work is licensed by Knowledge Unlatched under a Creative Commons license |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode | |
| 546 | |a German. | ||
| 590 | |a JSTOR |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased | ||
| 590 | |a JSTOR |b Books at JSTOR Open Access | ||
| 610 | 1 | 0 | |a Germany. |b Bundesverfassungsgericht. |
| 610 | 1 | 0 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court. |
| 610 | 1 | 6 | |a États-Unis. |b Supreme Court. |
| 610 | 1 | 7 | |a Germany. |b Bundesverfassungsgericht |2 fast |
| 610 | 1 | 7 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court |2 fast |
| 650 | 0 | |a Civil rights |z Germany. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Civil rights |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Constitutional law |z Germany. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Constitutional law |z United States. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Droits de l'homme |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Droit constitutionnel |z Allemagne. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Law. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Civil rights |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Constitutional law |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Germany |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast | |
| 653 | |a Bundesverfassungsgericht | ||
| 653 | |a Chilling effects | ||
| 653 | |a Comparative law | ||
| 653 | |a Constitutional & administrative law | ||
| 653 | |a German Federal Constitutional Court | ||
| 653 | |a Jurisprudence | ||
| 653 | |a LAB | ||
| 653 | |a LAM | ||
| 653 | |a LAW016000 | ||
| 653 | |a LAW017000 | ||
| 653 | |a LAW018000 | ||
| 653 | |a LAW051000 | ||
| 653 | |a LAW052000 | ||
| 653 | |a LAW075000 | ||
| 653 | |a LAW089000 | ||
| 653 | |a LBG | ||
| 653 | |a LND | ||
| 653 | |a Philosophy of law | ||
| 653 | |a Political Science | ||
| 653 | |a Theory of law | ||
| 653 | |a US Supreme Court | ||
| 776 | 0 | |z 3161548388 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctt2250v53 |z Texto completo |
| 938 | |a Knowledge Unlatched |b KNOW |n ee2f0892-290d-4b38-a5ee-3602735594f4 | ||
| 938 | |a OAPEN Foundation |b OPEN |n 644491 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b IZTAP | ||