Cargando…

Animus : a short introduction to bias in the law /

An introduction to the legal concept of unconstitutional bias.If a town council denies a zoning permit for a group home for intellectually disabled persons because residents don't want "those kinds of people" in the neighborhood, the town's decision is motivated by the public...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Araiza, William D. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: New York : New York University Press, [2017]
Colección:Legal Latin in practice.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ii 4500
001 JSTOR_ocn972734001
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 170216s2017 nyu ob 001 0 eng d
010 |a  2016045479 
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d N$T  |d YDX  |d EBLCP  |d TEFOD  |d OCLCF  |d JSTOR  |d CUY  |d IDB  |d OCLCQ  |d P@U  |d OL$  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d DEGRU  |d MM9  |d UX1  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 973180420  |a 973829731  |a 1080551526  |a 1125927218  |a 1175623578 
020 |a 9781479840939  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1479840939  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9781479846030 
020 |z 1479846031 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000060342074 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000067253226 
035 |a (OCoLC)972734001  |z (OCoLC)973180420  |z (OCoLC)973829731  |z (OCoLC)1080551526  |z (OCoLC)1125927218  |z (OCoLC)1175623578 
037 |a 43192F89-DEE9-46D7-A62B-151E3ED3EB11  |b OverDrive, Inc.  |n http://www.overdrive.com 
037 |a 22573/ctt1ggjx13  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF4764  |b .A972 2017eb 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 101000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 044000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 052000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 071000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 098000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 079000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 340/.11  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Araiza, William D.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Animus :  |b a short introduction to bias in the law /  |c William D. Araiza. 
264 1 |a New York :  |b New York University Press,  |c [2017] 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Legal Latin in practice 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Class legislation and the prehistory of animus -- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno -- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center -- Romer v. Evans and beyond -- United States v. Windsor -- What's wrong with subjective dislike? -- Objectively objectionable -- The doctrinal uniqueness of animus -- The elusive search for animus -- How much animus is enough? and what should we do about it? -- Applying what we've learned -- Obergefell and animus -- Animus doctrine today and tomorrow. 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed February 16, 2017). 
520 |a An introduction to the legal concept of unconstitutional bias.If a town council denies a zoning permit for a group home for intellectually disabled persons because residents don't want "those kinds of people" in the neighborhood, the town's decision is motivated by the public's dislike of a particular group. Constitutional law calls this rationale "animus."Over the last two decades, the Supreme Court has increasingly turned to the concept of animus to explain why some instances of discrimination are unconstitutional. However, the Court's condemnation of animus fails to address some serious questions. How can animus on the part of people and institutions be uncovered? Does mere opposition to a particular group's equality claims constitute animus? Does the concept of animus have roots in the Constitution?Animus engages these important questions, offering an original and provocative introduction to this type of unconstitutional bias. William Araiza analyzes some of the modern Supreme Court's most important discrimination cases through the lens of animus, tracing the concept from nineteenth century legal doctrine to today's landmark cases, including Obergefell vs. Hodges and United States v. Windsor, both related to the legal rights of same-sex couples. Animus humanizes what might otherwise be an abstract legal question, illustrating what constitutes animus, and why the prohibition against it matters more today than ever in our pluralistic society. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
650 0 |a Equality before the law  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Discrimination  |x Law and legislation  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Sociological jurisprudence  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |z United States. 
650 6 |a Sociologie juridique  |z États-Unis. 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Essays.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x General Practice.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Jurisprudence.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Paralegals & Paralegalism.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Practical Guides.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Reference.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Constitutional law  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Discrimination  |x Law and legislation  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Equality before the law  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Sociological jurisprudence  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Araiza, William D.  |t Animus.  |d New York : New York University Press, [2017]  |z 9781479846030  |w (DLC) 2016045479  |w (OCoLC)959922131 
830 0 |a Legal Latin in practice. 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctt1ggjjwq  |z Texto completo 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 13509052 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n muse68996 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1367268 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL4714303 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n BDZ0034433182 
938 |a De Gruyter  |b DEGR  |n 9781479840939 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP