Cargando…
Legal realism regained : saving realism from critical acclaim /
This title presents a comparison between the legal realists, a group of pragmatic legal theorists from the 1920s and 1930s, and critical legal studies, a movement of postmodern legal theory during the end of the 20th century. It argues for a return to legal realism and the classical pragmatism of Jo...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Stanford, Calif. :
Stanford Law,
2008.
|
| Colección: | Jurists.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Ma 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | JSTOR_ocn967255467 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20231005004200.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 130423s2008 cau fob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a STBDS |b eng |e pn |c STBDS |d OCLCF |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d LEAUB |d OCL |d OCLCQ |d JSTOR |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO | ||
| 020 | |a 9780804787529 |q (ebook) | ||
| 020 | |a 0804787522 | ||
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@ |b 000066193538 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)967255467 | ||
| 037 | |a 22573/ctvr0r7zk |b JSTOR | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K341 |b .D43 2008 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 052000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340.1 |2 23 |
| 049 | |a UAMI | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a De Been, Wouter, |d 1966- | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Legal realism regained : |b saving realism from critical acclaim / |c Wouter de Been. |
| 260 | |a Stanford, Calif. : |b Stanford Law, |c 2008. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (x, 249 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Jurists | |
| 520 | 8 | |a This title presents a comparison between the legal realists, a group of pragmatic legal theorists from the 1920s and 1930s, and critical legal studies, a movement of postmodern legal theory during the end of the 20th century. It argues for a return to legal realism and the classical pragmatism of John Dewey and William James, and for a rejection of the postmodern critique of critical legal studies. | |
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 590 | |a JSTOR |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) | ||
| 590 | |a JSTOR |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Law |x Philosophy. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Jurisprudence |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Law |x Philosophy |2 fast | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |z 9780804756594 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Jurists. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctvr33bkw |z Texto completo |
| 938 | |a Oxford University Press USA |b OUPR |n EDZ0000127841 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b IZTAP | ||