Cargando…

Summa contra gentiles. Book two, Creation /

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Thomas, Aquinas, Saint, 1225?-1274
Otros Autores: Anderson, James F. (James Francis), 1910-1981
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Latín
Publicado: Notre Dame IN : University of Notre Dame Press, 1975.
Edición:University of Notre Dame Press edition.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ii 4500
001 JSTOR_ocn957700029
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr bn|---uuaua
008 160917s1975 inu ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a EBLCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c EBLCP  |d KMS  |d IDEBK  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCQ  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d JSTOR  |d OCLCQ  |d KMS  |d IYU  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 960041636 
020 |a 9780268158873  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0268158878  |q (electronic bk.) 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000066144561 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000070030010 
035 |a (OCoLC)957700029  |z (OCoLC)960041636 
037 |a 22573/ctvpgnmb6  |b JSTOR 
041 1 |a eng  |h lat 
050 4 |a BT1117 
082 0 4 |a 230.2 
049 |a UAMI 
100 0 |a Thomas,  |c Aquinas, Saint,  |d 1225?-1274. 
240 1 0 |a Summa contra gentiles.  |l English 
245 1 0 |a Summa contra gentiles.  |n Book two,  |p Creation /  |c Saint Thomas Aquinas ; translated, with an introduction and notes, by James F. Anderson. 
246 3 0 |a Creation 
250 |a University of Notre Dame Press edition. 
260 |a Notre Dame IN :  |b University of Notre Dame Press,  |c 1975. 
300 |a 1 online resource (351 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
500 |a Originally published: On the truth of the Catholic faith. Garden City, NY : Hanover House, 1956; first paperback edition 1956 by Image Books. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a The connection between the following considerations and the preceding ones -- That the consideration of creatures is useful for instruction of faith -- That knowledge of the nature of creatures serves to destroy errors concerning God -- That the philosopher and the theologian consider creatures in different ways -- Order of procedure -- That it is proper to God to be the source of the being of other things -- That active power exists in God -- That God's power is His substance -- That God's power is His action -- How power is attributed to God -- That something is said of God in relation to creatures -- That relations predicated of God in reference to creatures do not really exist in Him -- How the aforesaid relations are predicated of God -- That God is to all things the cause of being -- That God brought things into being from nothing -- That creation is neither motion nor change -- How objections against creation are solved -- That in creation no succession exists -- That no body is capable of creative action -- That the act of creating belongs to God alone -- That God is omnipotent -- That God does not act by natural necessity -- That God acts conformably to His wisdom -- How the omnipotent God is said to be incapable of certain things -- That the divine intellect is not confined to limited effects -- That the divine will is not restricted to certain effects -- How dueness is entailed in the production of things -- How absolute necessity can exist in created things -- That it is not necessary for creatures to have always existed -- Arguments of those who wish to demonstrate the world's eternity from the point of view of God -- Arguments of those who wish to prove the eternity of the world from the standpoint of creatures -- Arguments to prove the eternity of the world from the point of view of the making of things -- Solution of the foregoing arguments, and first of those taken from the standpoint of God -- Solution of the arguments proposed from the point of view of the things made -- Solution of the arguments taken from the point of view of the making of things -- Arguments by which some try to show that the world is not eternal -- That the distinction of things is not the result of chance -- That matter is not the first cause of the distinction of things -- That a contrariety of agents does not account for the distinction of things -- That the first cause of the distinction of things is not the world of secondary agents -- That the distinction of things is not caused by some secondary agent introducing diverse forms into matter -- That the distinction of things does not have its source in the diversity of merits or demerits -- The true first cause of the distinction of things -- That the perfection of the universe required the existence of some intellectual creatures -- That intellectual substances are endowed with will -- That intellectual substances have freedom of choice in acting -- That the intellectual substance is not a body -- That intellectual substances are immaterial -- That the intellectual substance is not a material form -- That in created intellectual substances, being and what is differ -- That in created intellectual substances there is act and potentiality -- That the composition of substance and being is not the same as the composition of matter and form -- That intellectual substances are incorruptible -- In what way an intellectual substance can be united to the body -- The position of Plato concerning the union of the intellectual soul with the body -- That in man there are not three souls, nutritive, sensitive, and intellective -- That man's possible intellect is not a separate substance -- That man derives his specific nature, not from the passive, but from the possible, intellect -- That this theory is contrary to the teaching of Aristotle -- Against Alexander's opinion concerning the possible intellect -- That the soul is not a temperament, as Galen maintained -- That the soul is not a harmony -- That the soul is not a body -- Against those who maintain that intellect and sense are the same -- Against those who hold that the possible intellect is the imagination -- How an intellectual substance can be the form of the body -- Solution of the arguments advanced above in order to show that an intellectual substance cannot be united to the body as its form -- That according to the words of Aristotle the intellect must be said to be united to the body as its form -- That the soul is united to the body without intermediation -- That the whole soul is in the whole body and in each of its parts -- That there is not one possible intellect in all men -- Concerning the theory of Avicenna, who said that intelligible forms are not preserved in the possible intellect -- Solution of the seemingly demonstrative arguments for the unity of the possible intellect -- That the agent intellect is not a separate substance, but part of the soul -- That it is not impossible for the possible and agent intellect to exist together in the one substance of the soul -- That Aristotle held not that the agent intellect is a separate substance, but that it is a part of the soul -- That the human soul does not perish when the body is corrupted -- Arguments to prove that the corruption of the body entails that of the soul [and their solution] -- That the souls of brute animals are not immortal -- That the human soul begins to exist when the body does -- Solution of the preceding arguments -- That the soul is not made of God's substance -- That the human soul is not transmitted with the semen -- That the human soul is brought into being through the creative action of God -- Arguments designed to prove that the human soul is formed from the semen -- Solution of the preceding arguments -- That an intellectual substance is united only to a human body as its form -- That there are some intellectual substances which are not united to bodies -- Concerning the great number of separate substances -- Of the non-existence of a plurality of separate substances of one species -- That the separate substance and the soul are not of the same species -- How in separate substances genus and species are to be taken -- That separate substances do not receive their knowledge from sensible things -- That the intellect of a separate substance is always in act of understanding -- How one separate substance understands another -- That separate substances know material things -- That separate substances know singulars -- Whether separate substances have natural knowledge of all things at the same time. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Evidence Based Acquisitions 
610 2 0 |a Catholic Church  |x Doctrines  |v Early works to 1800. 
610 2 0 |a Catholic Church  |x Apologetic works  |v Early works to 1800. 
610 2 6 |a Église catholique  |x Doctrines  |v Ouvrages avant 1800. 
610 2 7 |a Catholic Church  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Apologetics  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Theology, Doctrinal  |2 fast 
655 7 |a Early works  |2 fast 
700 1 |a Anderson, James F.  |q (James Francis),  |d 1910-1981. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Thomas, Aquinas, Saint, 1225?-1274.  |s Summa contra gentiles. English.  |t Summa contra gentiles. Book two, Creation .  |d Notre Dame IN : University of Notre Dame Press, ©1976  |z 9780268016807 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctvpj74rh  |z Texto completo 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL4658689 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n cis35643472 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP